Leon Henkin
Leon Albert Henkin (April 19, 1921,
Brooklyn, New York – November 1, 2006,
Oakland, California) was an American logician, whose works played a strong role in the development of logic, particularly in the
theory of types. He was an active scholar at the
University of California, Berkeley, where he made great contributions as a researcher and teacher, as well as in administrative positions. At this university he directed, together with
Alfred Tarski, the ''Group in Logic and the Methodology of Science'', from which many important logicians and philosophers emerged. He had a strong sense of social commitment and was a passionate defender of his pacifist and progressive ideas. He took part in many social projects aimed at teaching mathematics, as well as projects aimed at supporting women's and minority groups to pursue careers in mathematics and related fields. A lover of dance and literature, he appreciated life in all its facets: art, culture, science and, above all, the warmth of human relations. He is remembered by his students for his great kindness, as well as for his academic and teaching excellence.
Henkin is mainly known for his
completeness proofs of diverse
formal systems, such as type theory and
first-order logic (the completeness of the latter, in its weak version, had been proven by
Kurt Gödel in 1929). To prove the completeness of type theory, Henkin introduces new semantics, not equivalent to standard semantics, based on structures called general models (also known as ''
Henkin models''). The change of semantics that he proposed permits to provide a complete
deductive calculus for type theory and for
second-order logic, amongst other logics. Henkin methods have aided in proving various
model theory results, both in
classical and
non-classical logics. Besides logic, the other branch on which his investigations were centered was
algebra; he specialized in
cylindric algebras, in which he worked together with Tarski and Donald Monk. As for the philosophy of mathematics, although the works in which he explicitly approaches it are scarce, he can be considered to have a
nominalist position.
Provided by Wikipedia