MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 1012151379
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0705-3657 
022 |a 1499-6642 
024 7 |a 10.22230/cjc.2012v37n1a2526  |2 doi 
035 |a 1012151379 
045 2 |b d20120101  |b d20120331 
084 |a 54876  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Wershler, Darren 
245 1 |a The Xenotext Experiment, So Far 
260 |b University of Toronto Press  |c 2012 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a The major roadblock that prevents communication studies from paying more attention to media poetry and poetics is the general tendency to divide how we think about the world into what the hard sciences and social sciences are allowed to say with credibility, compared to what poetry (in its diminished capacity), along with the other arts and humanities, are allowed to say with credibility. Science, for example, can style its actions as "poetic" (Stengers, 1997), but it's much harder for a poet to claim that their work is "scientific." Christian Bök (2002) points out that science and poetry share a common history but an aparallel evolution: "Whenever science gains the anonymous power to speak the truth about things, poetry seeks an eponymous refuge in the space of its own words" (p. 15). Bruno Latour has written about this problem extensively, most directly in We Have Never Been Modern (Latour, 1993). His major point is that such "Great Divides" between the territories of disciplines means that all sorts of boundary objects fall through the cracks, and the processes that create those hybrids remain "invisible, unthinkable, unrepresentable" (p. 34). In contemporary society, such objects are precisely those that are the most interesting and controversial; however, scholars are ill equipped to assess their significance as a result of the limited toolsets of a particular discipline, even an inter-discipline. As McLuhan observed, "The problem with a cheap, specialized education is you never stop paying for it" (McLuhan & Carson, 2003, p. 531). In an era of skills-based, "practical" education, we desperately need interdisciplinary thinkers, people to think about what's NOT been taken into account. Along with each alphabet cipher, Bök keeps notes on the way that the creation of words works: "abased," for example, is also "iciest"; "binary" is also "caring," and "bin" is also "car." In another cipher called WOR-VTT 190, the imagist poem "tidal / words of life / copy song" corresponds to "roads / vital in song / pick life." These are, he emphasizes, starting points. After hundreds of experiments over several years, Bök has yet to find a cipher that produces more than 786 words, and most of those words are less than five letters long. As a result, he expects that the final poem wUl have to be less than 20 words long, whüe his initial estimate was 200. The division of knowledge Ui the academy between disciplines is not the only issue. As Star and [James R. Griesemer] (1989) imply, Uistitutions and funding bodies are also actively involved as gatekeepers Ui the constitution and maintenance of boundary objects. Bök started seeking funding for the Xenotext Experiment from SSHRC Ui 2005 but only received a SSHRC Research Creation grant Ui 2009. This long and frustrating process of suppUcation is documented Ui "Poemosapien: Christian Bök & His Quest To Write A Living Poem," a nonfiction comic which originally appeared Ui Unlimited magazine in 2008. In the last three frames, Bök dismisses the literary substance of various poems he's performed that were generated by various possible ciphers as "Pretty bad. These are just ways of showcasing this for grants or something." After being rejected by a periwigged arts council jury, who are banging a gavel and proclaiming "Won't Sell! Won't Finish! Science Fiction!", the author thinks to himself "idiots ... fucking idiots" (Johnson, 2008, p. 51). What is actually occurring, though, is not a failure, but the difficult negotiation of protocols between social worlds, which indicates that the boundary object is actually functioning as a kind of bridge. Star and Griesemer (1989) conclude that "protocols are not simply the imposition of one world's vision on the rest; if they are, they are sure to fail" (p. 414)· Because of the Xenotext Experiment, a poet can simultaneously inhabit the social worlds of public intellectuals, scientists doing postgraduate level biology and computer programming, celebrities, media theorists, and slightly rumpled, grumpy Tintin-like cartoon characters, as well as the more usual realms of artists and academics. But these worlds, and the people and objects that make the constitution of boundary objects like the Xenotext possible, also make demands that change what it means to be a poet, and what it means to write a poem. As Isabelle Stengers (1997) remarks in Power and Invention, accusations of "failure" are ideologically marked: 
610 4 |a Wikipedia University of Minnesota Press 
651 4 |a Canada 
653 |a Communication research 
653 |a Media 
653 |a Poets 
653 |a Canadian art 
653 |a Poetry 
653 |a Encryption 
653 |a Artists 
653 |a Protocol (computers) 
653 |a Words (language) 
653 |a Magazines 
653 |a Negotiation 
653 |a Biology 
653 |a Words 
653 |a Poetics 
653 |a Cracks 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Constitution 
653 |a Social sciences 
653 |a Nonfiction 
653 |a Credibility 
653 |a Algorithms 
653 |a Arts 
653 |a Science fiction 
653 |a Fiction 
653 |a Ideology 
653 |a Truth 
653 |a Funding 
653 |a Computer programming 
653 |a Graduate studies 
653 |a Science 
653 |a Communication 
653 |a Media art 
653 |a Interdisciplinary aspects 
653 |a Experiments 
653 |a Juries 
653 |a Christians 
653 |a Celebrities 
653 |a Humanities 
653 |a Grants 
653 |a Modern society 
653 |a Christianity 
653 |a Academic disciplines 
653 |a Refuge 
653 |a Mass media 
653 |a Academic staff 
653 |a Science fiction & fantasy 
653 |a Interdisciplinary education 
653 |a Imposition 
653 |a Power 
653 |a Alphabets 
773 0 |t Canadian Journal of Communication  |g vol. 37, no. 1 (2012), p. 43-60 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1012151379/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1012151379/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1012151379/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch