Performance comparison of spectral wave models based on different governing equations including wave breaking

Furkejuvvon:
Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Publikašuvnnas:KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering vol. 13, no. 2 (Mar 2009), p. 75
Váldodahkki: Oh, Sang-Ho
Eará dahkkit: Suh, Kyung-Duck, Son, Sang Young, Lee, Dong Young
Almmustuhtton:
Springer Nature B.V.
Fáttát:
Liŋkkat:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Fáddágilkorat: Lasit fáddágilkoriid
Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 1113371982
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1226-7988 
022 |a 1976-3808 
024 7 |a 10.1007/s12205-009-0075-y  |2 doi 
035 |a 1113371982 
045 2 |b d20090301  |b d20090331 
084 |a 176037  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Oh, Sang-Ho  |u Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute, Coastal Engineering & Ocean Energy Research Department, Ansan, Korea (GRID:grid.418984.8) 
245 1 |a Performance comparison of spectral wave models based on different governing equations including wave breaking 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Mar 2009 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a The performance of three spectral wave models based on different types of governing equations, REF/DIF S, MIKE 21 BW module, and SWAN, was compared by using four laboratory or field experimental data sets. The comparison was focused on accurate prediction of measured wave heights. Characteristics of the three wave models were discussed and their overall predictability of the measured data was evaluated by calculating mean absolute relative errors of wave height. All the numerical models simulated fairly well shoaling and breaking of waves propagating on a plane sloping beach, but the model accuracy was somewhat degenerated in simulating waves propagating over a barred beach. Among the three models, MIKE 21 BW was the most insensitive to the bathymetric change. Combined refraction-diffraction over a shoal without breaking was quite well simulated by the models, especially by REF/DIF S and MIKE 21 BW. When waves break over the shoal, however, all the models failed to reproduce the wave field behind the shoal. The agreement with data in simulating wave diffraction around breakwater was remarkably good for MIKE 21 BW, but poor for other two models. Except the last simulation, the mean absolute relative errors of wave height from the three models ranged between 3 and 27%. 
653 |a Models 
653 |a Waves 
653 |a Shoaling 
653 |a Wave height 
653 |a Beaches 
653 |a Wave diffraction 
653 |a Wave breaking 
653 |a Breakwaters 
653 |a Model accuracy 
653 |a Diffraction 
653 |a Shoals 
653 |a Equations 
653 |a Studies 
653 |a Numerical models 
653 |a Mathematical models 
653 |a Wave propagation 
653 |a Errors 
653 |a Simulation 
653 |a Environmental 
700 1 |a Suh, Kyung-Duck  |u Seoul National University, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering & Engineering Research Institute, Seoul, Korea (GRID:grid.31501.36) (ISNI:0000000404705905) 
700 1 |a Son, Sang Young  |u Hyundai Engineering & Construction Company, Hyundai Institute of Construction and Technology, Yongin, Korea (GRID:grid.31501.36) 
700 1 |a Lee, Dong Young  |u Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute, Climate Change & Coastal Disaster Research Department, Ansan, Korea (GRID:grid.418984.8) 
773 0 |t KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering  |g vol. 13, no. 2 (Mar 2009), p. 75 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Engineering Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1113371982/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1113371982/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch