The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | PLoS Medicine vol. 4, no. 10 (Oct 2007), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Autor Corporativo: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , , , , |
| Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1288085840 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1549-1277 | ||
| 022 | |a 1549-1676 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 1288085840 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20071001 |b d20071031 | |
| 084 | |a 17941714 | ||
| 084 | |a 174833 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Elm, Erik von | |
| 110 | 2 | |a STROBE Initiative | |
| 245 | 1 | |a The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies | |
| 260 | |b Public Library of Science |c Oct 2007 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article Guideline | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies. Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies. | |
| 610 | 4 | |a Annals of Internal Medicine PLoS Medicine World Health Organization | |
| 650 | 2 | 2 | |a Case-Control Studies |
| 650 | 2 | 2 | |a Cohort Studies |
| 650 | 2 | 2 | |a Cross-Sectional Studies |
| 650 | 1 | 2 | |a Epidemiologic Research Design |
| 650 | 1 | 2 | |a Observation |
| 650 | 2 | 2 | |a Observation |x methods |
| 650 | 1 | 2 | |a Publishing |x standards |
| 653 | |a Internal medicine | ||
| 653 | |a Observational studies | ||
| 653 | |a Journals | ||
| 653 | |a Research & development--R&D | ||
| 653 | |a Preventive medicine | ||
| 653 | |a Epidemiology | ||
| 653 | |a Funding | ||
| 653 | |a Health services | ||
| 653 | |a Medical research | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Altman, Douglas G | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Egger, Matthias | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pocock, Stuart J | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gøtzsche, Peter C | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vandenbroucke, Jan P | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Initiative, for theSTROBE | |
| 773 | 0 | |t PLoS Medicine |g vol. 4, no. 10 (Oct 2007), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Health & Medical Collection | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1288085840/abstract/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1288085840/fulltext/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1288085840/fulltextPDF/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch |