Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Elementary Mathematics. What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report. Updated

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:What Works Clearinghouse (May 2013), p. 1-18
Autor Corporativo: What Works Clearinghouse
Publicado:
What Works Clearinghouse
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 1373084826
003 UK-CbPIL
035 |a 1373084826 
045 2 |b d20130501  |b d20130531 
084 |a ED543640 
110 2 |a What Works Clearinghouse 
245 1 |a Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Elementary Mathematics. What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report. Updated 
260 |b What Works Clearinghouse  |c May 2013 
513 |a Report 
520 3 |a "Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Elementary Mathematics" is a core mathematics curriculum for students in prekindergarten through grade 6. The program aims to improve students' understanding of key math concepts through problem-solving instruction, hands-on activities, and math problems that involve reading and writing. The curriculum focuses on problem-solving skills, assessments, and exercises tailored to students of different ability levels. According to its developer, "Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Elementary Mathematics" is aligned to the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) standards for the elementary grades. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) identified 13 studies that investigated the effects of "Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Elementary Mathematics" on the math performance of elementary school students. The WWC reviewed seven of these studies against group design evidence standards. Three studies (Agodini, Harris, Thomas, Murphy, & Gallagher, 2010; Resendez & Azin, 2006; Resendez & Manley, 2005) are randomized controlled trials that meet WWC evidence standards without reservations. These three studies are summarized in this report. Four studies do not meet WWC evidence standards. The remaining six studies do not meet WWC eligibility screens for review in this topic area. Appended are: (1) Research details for Agodini et al. (2010); (2) Research details for Resendez & Azin (2006); (3) Research details for Resendez & Manley (2005); (4) Outcome measures for the mathematics achievement domain; and (5) Findings included in the rating for the mathematics achievement domain. A glossary of terms is included. (Contains 6 tables and 9 endnotes.) 
651 4 |a Connecticut 
651 4 |a Florida 
651 4 |a Kentucky 
651 4 |a Minnesota 
651 4 |a Mississippi 
651 4 |a Missouri 
651 4 |a Nevada 
651 4 |a New Jersey 
651 4 |a New York 
651 4 |a Ohio 
651 4 |a South Carolina 
651 4 |a Texas 
651 4 |a Virginia 
651 4 |a Washington 
651 4 |a Wyoming 
651 4 |a United States--US 
653 |a Core Curriculum 
653 |a Elementary School Mathematics 
653 |a Elementary School Students 
653 |a Mathematics Achievement 
653 |a Grade 1 
653 |a Grade 2 
653 |a Grade 3 
653 |a Grade 4 
653 |a Grade 5 
653 |a Instructional Effectiveness 
653 |a Educational Research 
773 0 |t What Works Clearinghouse  |g (May 2013), p. 1-18 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ERIC 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1373084826/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED543640