Management development and co-production: myths and realities

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:The Journal of Management Development vol. 32, no. 9 (2013), p. 971
Autor principal: Fenwick, John
Altres autors: McMillan, Janice
Publicat:
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 1462454276
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0262-1711 
022 |a 1758-7492 
024 7 |a 10.1108/JMD-07-2012-0083  |2 doi 
035 |a 1462454276 
045 2 |b d20131020  |b d20131129 
084 |a 14846  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Fenwick, John 
245 1 |a Management development and co-production: myths and realities 
260 |b Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |c 2013 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to address the relationship between public sector practitioners and academic providers in the design and delivery of management development programmes. What is the added value of HEI involvement in management development and does this intervention generate knowledge that could not be produced by the organisation alone? This paper offers a critical discussion of the concept of mutual co-production, arguing that management development programmes may address the organisational needs of clients, or those of providers, without necessarily representing creative and consensual co-creation. Design/methodology/approach - Discussion is drawn from qualitative interviews in Scotland and England with academics providing management development programmes, together with managers from two public sector organisations. Initial interviews carried out in 2011 were supplemented by additional interviews with academic providers in 2012. Findings - Management development programmes may serve primarily to address the internal objectives of client organisations and academic providers alike. True co-creation requires timescales and relationships of trust that need to be built over time. Practical implications - Critical insight into the commercial relationship between providers and public organisations enables greater clarity about what the provider is selling and what the organisation is buying. This contributes to conceptual understanding of the management development relationship, and, moreover, to open and effective practice. Originality/value - The paper critically addresses the management development relationship between client and provider and informs future practice and further research. 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Teachers 
653 |a Theory 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Studies 
653 |a Management development 
653 |a Public sector 
653 |a Higher education 
653 |a Accreditation 
653 |a Knowledge 
653 |a Semi Structured Interviews 
653 |a Data Analysis 
653 |a Teaching Methods 
653 |a Interviews 
653 |a Theory Practice Relationship 
653 |a Mythology 
700 1 |a McMillan, Janice 
773 0 |t The Journal of Management Development  |g vol. 32, no. 9 (2013), p. 971 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1462454276/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1462454276/fulltext/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1462454276/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch