Electrophysiological Explorations of the Bilingual Advantage: Evidence from a Stroop Task

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:PLoS One vol. 9, no. 7 (Jul 2014), p. e103424
Autor principal: Coderre, Emily L
Otros Autores: Walter J B van Heuven
Publicado:
Public Library of Science
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 1552687639
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1932-6203 
024 7 |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0103424  |2 doi 
035 |a 1552687639 
045 2 |b d20140701  |b d20140731 
084 |a 174835  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Coderre, Emily L 
245 1 |a Electrophysiological Explorations of the Bilingual Advantage: Evidence from a Stroop Task 
260 |b Public Library of Science  |c Jul 2014 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Bilinguals have been shown to exhibit a performance advantage on executive control tasks, outperforming their monolingual counterparts. Although a wealth of research has investigated this ‘bilingual advantage’ behaviourally, electrophysiological correlates are lacking. Using EEG with a Stroop task that manipulated the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of word and colour presentation, the current study addressed two facets of the bilingual advantage. The possibility that bilinguals experience superior conflict processing relative to monolinguals (a ‘conflict-specific advantage’) was investigated by comparing behavioural interference effects as well as the amplitude of the Ninc, a conflict-related ERP component occurring from approximately 300–500 ms after the onset of conflict. In contrast, the hypothesis that bilinguals experience domain-general, conflict-independent enhancements in executive processing (a ‘non-conflict-specific advantage’) was evaluated by comparing the control condition (symbol strings) between groups. There was some significant, but inconsistent, evidence for a conflict-specific bilingual advantage. In contrast, strong evidence emerged for a non-conflict-specific advantage, with bilinguals demonstrating faster RTs and reduced ERP amplitudes on control trials compared to monolinguals. Importantly, when the control stimulus was presented before the colour, ERPs to control trials revealed group differences before the onset of conflict, suggesting differences in the ability to ignore or suppress distracting irrelevant information. This indicates that bilinguals experience superior executive processing even in the absence of conflict and semantic salience, and suggests that the advantage extends to more efficient proactive management of the environment. 
610 4 |a University of Nottingham 
651 4 |a United Kingdom--UK 
653 |a Language 
653 |a Control tasks 
653 |a Memory 
653 |a Hypotheses 
653 |a EEG 
653 |a Advantages 
653 |a Social 
653 |a Executive function 
653 |a Event-related potentials 
653 |a Linguistics 
653 |a Information processing 
653 |a Color 
653 |a Strings 
653 |a Bilingualism 
653 |a Semantics 
653 |a Conflict resolution 
700 1 |a Walter J B van Heuven 
773 0 |t PLoS One  |g vol. 9, no. 7 (Jul 2014), p. e103424 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1552687639/abstract/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1552687639/fulltext/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1552687639/fulltextPDF/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch