Computer Assisted Versus Traditional Testing: Statistical Assessment of Students' Performance in Different Types of Tests

Guardado en:
書目詳細資料
發表在:European Conference on e-Learning (Oct 2016), p. 650-656
主要作者: Sedlacik, Marek
其他作者: Cechova, Ivana
出版:
Academic Conferences International Limited
主題:
在線閱讀:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 1860070767
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2048-8637 
022 |a 2048-8645 
035 |a 1860070767 
045 2 |b d20161001  |b d20161031 
084 |a 183529  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Sedlacik, Marek 
245 1 |a Computer Assisted Versus Traditional Testing: Statistical Assessment of Students' Performance in Different Types of Tests 
260 |b Academic Conferences International Limited  |c Oct 2016 
513 |a Feature 
520 3 |a Computer technologies have opened up new possibilities for optimizing the administration of tests, test development and assessment. Computer Aided/Assisted Testing, as well as Computer Assisted Language Testing, have brought many positive aspects that can be applied in order to create a more positive attitude toward test assessment, to reduce item exposure and subsequent security risks, and provide a valid and reliable measurement of students' competence. Nowadays, teachers have a choice between supervised or unsupervised e-tests, and quite often they vote for unsupervised tests as these tests allow frequent testing of many students with fewer teaching staff, and give each student the significant freedom of choosing the time, place and manner in which to take the test. Teachers who prefer classical methods of teaching insist on paper-and-pen tests. The authors describe their experience with all of the above mentioned types of tests, and then focus on their research dealing with long-term observation of students' results and statistical assessment of their performance in English language. In this article, students' results of e-test tests and paper-and-pen tests (supervised and unsupervised) are compared in order to find any relationships among them, and to find an optimal proportion among various types of tests. Applied statistics have been applied to gain valid data when analysing different types of tests and comparing the results of these tests. Parametric and non-parametric statistical tests of the hypothesis regarding these relationships are described in the last part of this article. 
653 |a Writing 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Studies 
653 |a English language 
653 |a Reading 
653 |a Computer literacy 
653 |a Variables 
653 |a Foreign language learning 
653 |a Automation 
653 |a Mathematics Tests 
653 |a Positive Attitudes 
653 |a Computer Assisted Testing 
653 |a Teaching Methods 
653 |a Academic Achievement 
653 |a Innovation 
653 |a Test Preparation 
653 |a Language Tests 
653 |a Test Items 
653 |a Student Evaluation 
653 |a Adaptive Testing 
653 |a Writing Instruction 
653 |a Writing Evaluation 
653 |a Speech Evaluation 
653 |a English 
653 |a Writing Tests 
653 |a Measurement Techniques 
653 |a Writing Skills 
700 1 |a Cechova, Ivana 
773 0 |t European Conference on e-Learning  |g (Oct 2016), p. 650-656 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Education Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1860070767/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1860070767/fulltext/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/1860070767/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch