Interpretive and Precedential Nature of Decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court in Criminal Procedure
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Serii︠a︡ 5, I︠U︡risprudent︠s︡ii︠a︡ no. 4(29) (2015), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autor: | |
| Další autoři: | , |
| Vydáno: |
Volgograd State University
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | Citation/Abstract Full Text - PDF |
| Tagy: |
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2091922282 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2078-8495 | ||
| 022 | |a 2587-8115 | ||
| 035 | |a 2091922282 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20150101 |b d20151231 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Baranova, Marina Aleksandrovna | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Interpretive and Precedential Nature of Decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court in Criminal Procedure | |
| 260 | |b Volgograd State University |c 2015 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The article analyzes the Russian Federation Constitutional Court judgments in order to demonstrate their precedential nature. The article proves that the Russian Federation Constitutional Court judgments have precedential value for the criminal justice system, such judgments invalidating individual Clauses of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure, as they form new legal regulations changing standard criminal law and procedure. Compared to the standards stipulated by law, such legal regulations govern relations in criminal law and procedure. Typically, after a definite period of time a legislator considers legal proposition presented in the judgments and makes appropriate amendments and additions to the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure. The authors of the article believe that this fact is a further argument for accepting such decisions as judicial precedent. As for other judgments (decisions and orders) made by the body for constitutional supervision, they advise of the meaning of provisions of the criminal law and procedure; thus, they are interpretive acts mainly. However, as often as not the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure construe the impugned provision so broadly, that such acts acquire certain features of a precedent. The article concludes that judgments in question shall be accepted and legislated as a source of criminal law and procedure and scope of validity of the same shall be defined. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Russia | |
| 653 | |a Criminal procedure | ||
| 653 | |a Criminal law | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Grigoryan, Vagan Levonovich | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Golovina, Anastasiya Anatolyevna | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Serii︠a︡ 5, I︠U︡risprudent︠s︡ii︠a︡ |g no. 4(29) (2015), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Research Library | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2091922282/abstract/embedded/ZKJTFFSVAI7CB62C?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2091922282/fulltextPDF/embedded/ZKJTFFSVAI7CB62C?source=fedsrch |