WordCommentsAnalyzer: A windows software tool for qualitative research
Guardat en:
| Publicat a: | F1000Research vol. 7 (2018) |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Altres autors: | , , |
| Publicat: |
Faculty of 1000 Ltd.
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetes: |
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2114635246 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2046-1402 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.12688/f1000research.14819.2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 2114635246 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20180101 |b d20181231 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Abdekhodaie Ehsan | |
| 245 | 1 | |a WordCommentsAnalyzer: A windows software tool for qualitative research | |
| 260 | |b Faculty of 1000 Ltd. |c 2018 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a There is a lack of free software that provides a professional and smooth experience in text editing and markup for qualitative data analysis. Word processing software like Microsoft Word provides a good editing experience, allowing the researcher to effortlessly add comments to text portions. However, organizing the keywords and categories in the comments can become a more difficult task when the amount of data increases. We present WordCommentsAnalyzer, a software tool that is written in C# using .NET Framework and OpenXml, which helps a qualitative researcher to organize codes when using Microsoft Word as the primary text markup software. WordCommentsAnalyzer provides an effective user interface to count codes, to organize codes in a code hierarchy, and to see various data extracts belonging to each code. It also offers basic visualization tools. We illustrate how to use this software by conducting a preliminary content analysis on Tweets with the #successfulaging hashtag. We also demonstrate that the software has satisfactory performance on a large dataset of Iranian journals abstracts. We hope this open-source software will facilitate qualitative data analysis by researchers who are interested in using Word for this purpose. | |
| 610 | 4 | |a Microsoft Corp | |
| 653 | |a Arabic language | ||
| 653 | |a User interface | ||
| 653 | |a Data processing | ||
| 653 | |a Researchers | ||
| 653 | |a Computer programs | ||
| 653 | |a Codes | ||
| 653 | |a Datasets | ||
| 653 | |a Qualitative research | ||
| 653 | |a Visualization | ||
| 653 | |a Software | ||
| 653 | |a Software reviews | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Hatami Javad | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bahrami, Ehsan Hadi | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kormi-Nouri Reza | |
| 773 | 0 | |t F1000Research |g vol. 7 (2018) | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2114635246/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2114635246/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2114635246/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |