Axial wall height effect on failure of adhesively luted computer assisted design/computer assisted manufactured ceramic crowns on preparations containing advanced total occlusal convergence

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology vol. 32, no. 20 (Oct 2018), p. 2298
المؤلف الرئيسي: Spriggel, Robert
مؤلفون آخرون: DuVall, Nicholas, Brewster, John, Roberts, Howard
منشور في:
Taylor & Francis Ltd.
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:Citation/Abstract
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
الوصف
مستخلص:Computerized dentistry advocates promote that CAD/CAM adhesive technology compensates for traditional crown preparation recommendations. This study was to investigate the effect of preparation axial wall height on retention of adhesively-luted, all ceramic crowns manufactured by computerized methods. Maxillary molars were prepared with a 20 ° total occlusal convergence with preparation axial wall heights of 4, 3, 2, and 1 mm as well as an additional group containing a flat surface. The preparations were scanned with a computer acquisition device with crowns milled and prepared from a lithium disilicate ceramic material. The crowns were adhesively luted to the prepared tooth surfaces and then tested under static loading at a 45 ° angle to the tooth long axis on a universal testing machine until failure. Analysis with Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn's found that crowns with 2, 3, and 4 mm preparation axial wall height had similar failure loads and demonstrated significantly greater failure load resistance than the zero and 1 mm axial wall height groups. However, failure mode analysis revealed that the 2 mm axial wall height group demonstrated universal adhesive failures as the zero and 1 mm axial wall height groups. Under the conditions of this study, some evidence is provided that adhesive technology may provided some compensation for less than optimal preparation features as the 3 mm axial wall height preparations demonstrated equivalent failure mode as the recommended 4 mm axial wall height preparations. However, further fatigue studies are warranted.
تدمد:0169-4243
1568-5616
DOI:10.1080/01694243.2018.1474572
المصدر:Materials Science Database