Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Public Health vol. 94, no. 3 (Mar 2004), p. 361-366
Autor principal: Des Jarlais, Don C
Autor Corporativo: TREND Group
Otros Autores: Lyles, Cynthia, Crepaz, Nicole, Abbasi, Kamran, et al
Publicado:
American Public Health Association
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 215100640
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0090-0036 
022 |a 0002-9572 
022 |a 0271-4353 
022 |a 0273-1975 
035 |a 215100640 
045 2 |b d20040301  |b d20040331 
084 |a 14998794 
084 |a 8  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Des Jarlais, Don C 
110 2 |a TREND Group 
245 1 |a Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement 
260 |b American Public Health Association  |c Mar 2004 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Developing an evidence base for making public health decisions will require using data from evaluation studies with randomized and nonrandomized designs. Des Jarlais et al present an initial version of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs statement.   Developing an evidence base for making public health decisions will require using data from evaluation studies with randomized and nonrandomized designs. Assessing individual studies and using studies in quantitative research syntheses require transparent reporting of the study, with sufficient detail and clarity to readily see differences and similarities among studies in the same area. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement provides guidelines for transparent reporting of randomized clinical trials. We present the initial version of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs (TREND) statement. These guidelines emphasize the reporting of theories used and descriptions of intervention and comparison conditions, research design, and methods of adjusting for possible biases in evaluation studies that use nonrandomized designs. 
650 1 2 |a Behavioral Research 
650 2 2 |a Decision Making 
650 1 2 |a Epidemiologic Research Design 
650 2 2 |a Evidence-Based Medicine 
650 2 2 |a Humans 
650 2 2 |a Information Dissemination 
650 1 2 |a Intervention Studies 
650 2 2 |a Periodicals as Topic  |x standards 
650 1 2 |a Program Evaluation  |x methods 
650 1 2 |a Public Health Practice 
650 1 2 |a Publishing  |x standards 
650 2 2 |a Quality Control 
653 |a Public health 
653 |a Medical research 
653 |a Scientific method 
653 |a Health care 
653 |a Data analysis 
653 |a Behavior modification 
653 |a Standards 
653 |a Design 
653 |a Journals 
653 |a Acquired immune deficiency syndrome--AIDS 
653 |a Intervention 
653 |a Research design 
653 |a Health promotion 
653 |a Mental health 
653 |a Health behavior 
653 |a Health education 
653 |a Social 
700 1 |a Lyles, Cynthia 
700 1 |a Crepaz, Nicole 
700 1 |a Abbasi, Kamran 
700 1 |a et al 
773 0 |t American Journal of Public Health  |g vol. 94, no. 3 (Mar 2004), p. 361-366 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/215100640/abstract/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/215100640/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/215100640/fulltextPDF/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch