Choosing a Programming Language

Furkejuvvon:
Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Publikašuvnnas:IEEE Software vol. 23, no. 4 (Jul/Aug 2006), p. 62
Váldodahkki: Spinellis, Diomidis
Almmustuhtton:
IEEE Computer Society
Fáttát:
Liŋkkat:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Fáddágilkorat: Lasit fáddágilkoriid
Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 215843027
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0740-7459 
022 |a 1937-4194 
024 7 |a 10.1109/MS.2006.97  |2 doi 
035 |a 215843027 
045 2 |b d20060701  |b d20060831 
084 |a 16283  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Spinellis, Diomidis 
245 1 |a Choosing a Programming Language 
260 |b IEEE Computer Society  |c Jul/Aug 2006 
513 |a Feature 
520 3 |a There's no language suitable for all tasks, and there probably won't ever be one. When choosing a programming language, you have to balance programmer productivity, maintainability, efficiency, portability, tool support, and software and hardware interfaces. Often, one of these factors will shape your decision. In other cases, the choice depends on the productivity you gain from certain language features, such as modularity and type checking, or external factors, such as integrated development environment support. Finally, for some tasks, adopting an existing domain-specific language, building a new one, or using a general-purpose declarative language can be the right choice. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] 
653 |a Programming languages 
653 |a Computer programming 
653 |a C language 
653 |a Java 
653 |a Extensible Markup Language 
653 |a Productivity 
653 |a Software 
653 |a C plus plus 
653 |a Books 
653 |a Programmers 
653 |a Libraries 
653 |a Perl 
653 |a Efficiency 
773 0 |t IEEE Software  |g vol. 23, no. 4 (Jul/Aug 2006), p. 62 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/215843027/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/215843027/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch