HOW INVOLVED ARE AMERICAN L2 LEARNERS OF SPANISH IN LEXICAL INPUT PROCESSING TASKS DURING READING?

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:Studies in Second Language Acquisition vol. 31, no. 1 (Mar 2009), p. 31-58
Autor principal: Pulido, Diana
Publicat:
Cambridge University Press
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 224052765
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0272-2631 
022 |a 1470-1545 
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0272263109090020  |2 doi 
035 |a 224052765 
045 2 |b d20090301  |b d20090331 
084 |a 17614  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Pulido, Diana 
245 1 |a HOW INVOLVED ARE AMERICAN L2 LEARNERS OF SPANISH IN LEXICAL INPUT PROCESSING TASKS DURING READING? 
260 |b Cambridge University Press  |c Mar 2009 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a This study examines the nature of the involvement load (Laufer & Hulstijn, 2001) in second language (L2) lexical input processing through reading by considering the effects of the reader-based factors of L2 reading proficiency and background knowledge. The lexical input processing aspects investigated were lexical inferencing (search), attentional allocation during target word (TW) verification (evaluation), TW episodic memory after verification, TW retention, and changes in lexical input processing. This study also addresses the relationships between inferencing and retention as well as the relationships among the various phases of lexical input processing. A questionnaire on self-reported strategy use during the TW verification task was designed to examine motivation and cognitive involvement. A repeated-measures design was used with a cross-sectional sample of 35 adult L2 learners of Spanish. Participants read narratives (one more and one less familiar) that contained nonsense words. They guessed the meanings of the TWs. After reading all of the stories, participants completed an online inference verification task whose goal was to confirm or to correct guesses and to encourage deeper processing of TWs. This was followed by a test of TW episodic memory (yes/no verification) and a strategy questionnaire. Afterward, participants completed two tests that measured receptive retention of meaning. Analyses reveal differential effects of the reader-based variables across the different aspects of lexical input processing and negative changes in lexical input processing due to an interaction between reading proficiency and background knowledge. Results illustrate how reader-based factors also affect learner involvement and lexical input processing. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] 
653 |a Foreign language learning 
653 |a Language acquisition 
653 |a Linguistics 
653 |a Nonsense words 
653 |a Language proficiency 
653 |a Second language reading 
653 |a Long term memory 
653 |a Questionnaires 
653 |a Inference 
653 |a Episodic memory 
653 |a Retention 
653 |a Meaning 
653 |a Competence 
653 |a Hispanic Americans 
653 |a Attrition 
653 |a Participation 
653 |a Motivation 
653 |a Change agents 
653 |a Verification 
653 |a Retention (Psychology) 
653 |a Sight Vocabulary 
653 |a Semantics 
653 |a Prior Learning 
653 |a Word Processing 
653 |a Vocabulary Development 
653 |a Memory 
653 |a Reading Processes 
653 |a Metacognition 
653 |a Short Term Memory 
653 |a Reading Comprehension 
653 |a Second Language Learning 
653 |a Semiotics 
773 0 |t Studies in Second Language Acquisition  |g vol. 31, no. 1 (Mar 2009), p. 31-58 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Psychology Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/224052765/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/224052765/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/224052765/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch