Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Clinical Oral Investigations vol. 13, no. 3 (Sep 2009), p. 343-349
Autor principal: Beuer, Florian
Otros Autores: Naumann, Michael, Gernet, Wolfgang, Sorensen, John A
Publicado:
Springer Nature B.V.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 229643299
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1432-6981 
022 |a 1436-3771 
024 7 |a 10.1007/s00784-008-0224-6  |2 doi 
035 |a 229643299 
045 2 |b d20090901  |b d20090930 
084 |a 18769946 
084 |a 69703  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Beuer, Florian 
245 1 |a Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Sep 2009 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a   The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the precision of fit of substructures milled from semi-sintered zirconia blocks fabricated with two different computer-assisted design (CAD)/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAM) systems. Three-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDP) were fabricated for standardized dies (n=10) with the Lava CAD/CAM system (Lava) and the Procera-bridge-zirconia CAD/CAM system (Procera). After cementation to the dies, the FDP were embedded and sectioned. Four cross-sections were made of each abutment tooth, and marginal and internal fit were evaluated under an optical microscope. A one-way analysis of variance was used to compare data (α=0.05). Mean gap dimensions at the marginal opening for Lava and Procera were 15 (±7) μm and 9 (±5) μm, respectively. Mean marginal openings (P=0.012) and internal adaptation at two out of three measurement locations were significantly different. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the accuracy of both investigated systems is satisfactory for clinical use.   The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the precision of fit of substructures milled from semi-sintered zirconia blocks fabricated with two different computer-assisted design (CAD)/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAM) systems. Three-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDP) were fabricated for standardized dies (n = 10) with the Lava CAD/CAM system (Lava) and the Procera-bridge-zirconia CAD/CAM system (Procera). After cementation to the dies, the FDP were embedded and sectioned. Four cross-sections were made of each abutment tooth, and marginal and internal fit were evaluated under an optical microscope. A one-way analysis of variance was used to compare data (alpha = 0.05). Mean gap dimensions at the marginal opening for Lava and Procera were 15 (+/-7) microm and 9 (+/-5) microm, respectively. Mean marginal openings (P = 0.012) and internal adaptation at two out of three measurement locations were significantly different. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the accuracy of both investigated systems is satisfactory for clinical use. 
650 1 2 |a Computer-Aided Design 
650 1 2 |a Crowns 
650 2 2 |a Dental Abutments 
650 2 2 |a Dental Marginal Adaptation 
650 1 2 |a Dental Porcelain 
650 1 2 |a Dental Prosthesis Design  |x methods 
650 1 2 |a Denture, Partial, Fixed 
650 2 2 |a Prosthesis Fitting 
650 2 2 |a Zirconium 
700 1 |a Naumann, Michael 
700 1 |a Gernet, Wolfgang 
700 1 |a Sorensen, John A 
773 0 |t Clinical Oral Investigations  |g vol. 13, no. 3 (Sep 2009), p. 343-349 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/229643299/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/229643299/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/229643299/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch