Process Simulation Failure As A Learning Tool

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
הוצא לאור ב:Association for Engineering Education - Engineering Library Division Papers (Jun 20, 2004), p. 9.1011.1
מחבר ראשי: Silverstein, David
יצא לאור:
American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE
נושאים:
גישה מקוונת:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 2317835160
003 UK-CbPIL
035 |a 2317835160 
045 0 |b d20040620 
100 1 |a Silverstein, David 
245 1 |a Process Simulation Failure As A Learning Tool 
260 |b American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE  |c Jun 20, 2004 
513 |a Conference Proceedings 
520 3 |a Chemical process simulators have become ubiquitous in chemical engineering education. Students frequently view them as a black box of wonder that will make their engineering life much easier, when in fact the simulator may actually more closely resemble Pandora’s Box. When given a choice amongst an analytical solution to model equations, a numerical solution to model equations, or a simulator solution, students often trust the simulator results over their model, not realizing the simulator uses the same (or possibly an inappropriate) model. This paper discusses an approach of “learning through failure”, where students develop simulations for systems that produce results not matching reality. The goal is to make students aware of the need to critically validate any results obtained from a process simulator. Process simulation has become a core element of chemical engineering education. Recent surveys have indicated that simulators are used in most chemical engineering curricula, with an increasing use outside the capstone design course. Equilibrium staged separations, process control, and thermodynamics courses are the three most common settings for incorporating simulation into the curriculum outside the capstone design sequence.1 The increased use of process simulation has coincided with an increased dependency on computers in the lives of students. Students have grown accustomed to using computers for entertainment as well as engineering, and tend to trust software to give them accurate answers. With process simulators, this attitude is potentially dangerous. The adage “garbage in, garbage out” applies to process simulation, a fact that may be lost as fewer programs require computer programming as part of the core curriculum.1 For the purposes of this paper, process simulation failure is defined as simulations that run as expected, but yield results inconsistent with the processes they are intended to simulate. Motivation One of the topics covered during the Spring 2001 and Spring 2002 offerings of a course in Process Modeling at the University of Kentucky (UK) extended campus in Paducah was the need to validate computer generated results through various methods. As part of this discussion, the role of numerical methods in process simulation was covered along 
653 |a Simulation 
653 |a Simulators 
653 |a Chemical engineering 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Organic chemistry 
653 |a Garbage 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Engineering education 
653 |a Exact solutions 
653 |a Curricula 
653 |a Mathematical models 
653 |a Core curriculum 
653 |a Numerical methods 
653 |a Software 
653 |a Dependence 
653 |a Computer simulation 
653 |a Colleges & universities 
653 |a Computer programming 
653 |a College students 
653 |a Entertainment 
653 |a Computers 
653 |a Models 
653 |a Engineering 
653 |a Motivation 
653 |a Chemical process industries 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Attitudes 
653 |a Inappropriateness 
653 |a Wastes 
653 |a Process controls 
653 |a Curriculum development 
653 |a Dependency 
773 0 |t Association for Engineering Education - Engineering Library Division Papers  |g (Jun 20, 2004), p. 9.1011.1 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Library Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2317835160/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u https://peer.asee.org/process-simulation-failure-as-a-learning-tool