Modal existential wh-constructions
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | LingBuzz (Jan 2011), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Publicado: |
Universitetet i Tromsoe
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2323145107 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 035 | |a 2323145107 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20110101 |b d20110131 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Simik, Radek | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Modal existential wh-constructions | |
| 260 | |b Universitetet i Tromsoe |c Jan 2011 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This dissertation is a thorough investigation of the syntax, semantics, and typology of modal existential wh-constructions ("I have [with whom to speak]" `I have somebody who I can speak with') – the last major type of wh-construction (next to questions and relative clauses) that is still relatively poorly understood. I argue that their proper analysis enhances our understanding of a variety of richly discussed issues, including the syntax-semantics of argument structure, event structure, existential predicates, wh-movement, covert modality, and obligatory control. I argue for a radically new approach to modal existential wh-constructions. The core idea is that they are not ordinary objects of the verb which they are selected by (a predicate expressing the state of existence or availability, or a complex predicate leading to such a state), as previously assumed, but rather constitute an additional independent argument. This argument is an integral part of the complex event structure of the matrix verb – its “event extension” – and as such characterizes possible developments of the state or event denoted by the matrix predicate. The proposed analysis accounts for many apparently unmotivated properties of these constructions, including their highly restricted scope, modality, and syntactic distribution on the one hand, and a relative freedom of their internal syntactic shape on the other. The analysis also reveals a previously unobserved but remarkably tight relationship between modal existential wh-constructions and English purpose clauses. This dissertation is of interest to theoretically and typologically oriented linguists working on wh-constructions, purpose clauses, existential sentences, event structure, and modality. On a more general level, it deals with issues at the syntax-semantics and syntax-pragmatics interface. | |
| 653 | |a Semantics | ||
| 653 | |a Syntactic movement | ||
| 653 | |a Event semantics | ||
| 653 | |a Syntax semantics relationship | ||
| 653 | |a Relative clauses | ||
| 653 | |a Language typology | ||
| 653 | |a Syntactic structures | ||
| 653 | |a Syntax pragmatics interface | ||
| 653 | |a Pragmatics | ||
| 653 | |a Verbs | ||
| 653 | |a Argument structure | ||
| 653 | |a Sentence structure | ||
| 653 | |a Predicate | ||
| 653 | |a Existential constructions | ||
| 653 | |a Modality (Semantic) | ||
| 653 | |a Dissertations & theses | ||
| 653 | |a Property | ||
| 653 | |a Linguists | ||
| 653 | |a Syntax | ||
| 653 | |a Debates | ||
| 653 | |a Covert | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t LingBuzz |g (Jan 2011), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Publicly Available Content Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2323145107/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001247 |