Letters to the editor

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	National Forum vol. 79, no. 4 (Fall 1999), p. 45-46
1. Verfasser:	Anonymous
Veröffentlicht:	National Forum: Phi Kappa Phi Journal
Schlagworte:	Department of Justice Congress West Virginia University University of Houston Microsoft Corp New Mexico Highlands University Connecticut New Mexico Sacramento California California Hawaii West Virginia United States > US Fetuses Software Biomedical research Researchers Informed consent Research & development > R&D Abortion Legal medicine Law Legal language Terminology Attention Reading Antitrust Consumers Spelling Adults Biomedicine Government (Administrative Body) Computer Software Educational Technology Research and Development Brain Editing Legal Problems Aging (Individuals) Young Children
Online-Zugang:	Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie das erste Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Abstract:	Furthermore, it would cut the cost and morbidity associated with antirejection medications required in conventional implantology. [...]it might help solve the present shortage of suitable organs for transplantation. Perry's reliance on legal terminology and case law epitomizes the tendency of most Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to focus far too much attention on whether the informed consent form details all of the risks, the nondisclosure of which could result in a lawsuit, and far too little attention on whether the final document is likely to be comprehended by its probable reader. While a few IRBs may permit research that fails to adequately disclose risks, a vast majority are obsessed with avoiding lawsuits and the scrutiny of federal regulators. Because of this, the challenges facing researchers are seldom knowing whether their consent form meets the legal requirements.
ISSN:	0162-1831 1538-5914 0031-7225
Quelle:	Education Database