Player Session Rating of Perceived Exertion: A More Valid Tool Than Coaches’ Ratings to Monitor Internal Training Load in Elite Youth Female Basketball
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance vol. 15, no. 4 (Apr 2020), p. 548 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , , , |
| Publicado: |
Human Kinetics
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2420186217 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1555-0265 | ||
| 022 | |a 1555-0273 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0248 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 2420186217 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20200401 |b d20200430 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Lupo, Corrado | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Player Session Rating of Perceived Exertion: A More Valid Tool Than Coaches’ Ratings to Monitor Internal Training Load in Elite Youth Female Basketball | |
| 260 | |b Human Kinetics |c Apr 2020 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Purpose: To monitor elite youth female basketball training to verify whether players’ and coaches’ (3 technical coaches and 1 physical trainer) session rating of perceived exertion (s-RPE) has a relationship with Edwards’ method. Methods: Heart rate of 15 elite youth female basketball players (age 16.7 [0.5] y, height 178 [9] cm, body mass 72 [9] kg, body mass index 22.9 [2.2] kg·m−2) was monitored during 19 team (268 individual) training sessions (102 [15] min). Mixed effect models were applied to evaluate whether s-RPE values were significantly (P ≤ .05) related to Edwards’ data, total session duration, maximal intensity (session duration at 90–100% HRmax), type of training (ie, strength, conditioning, and technique), and whether differences emerged between players’ and coaches’ s-RPE values. Results: The results showed that there is a relationship between s-RPE and Edwards’ methods for the players’ RPE scores (P = .019) but not for those of the trainers. In addition, as expected, both players’ (P = .014) and coaches’ (P = .002) s-RPE scores were influenced by total session duration but not by maximal intensity and type of training. In addition, players’ and coaches’ s-RPE values differed (P < .001)—post hoc differences emerged for conditioning (P = .01) and technique (P < .001) sessions. Conclusions: Elite youth female basketball players are better able to quantify the internal training load of their sessions than their coaches, strengthening the validity of s-RPE as a tool to monitor training in team sports. | |
| 653 | |a Basketball | ||
| 653 | |a Training | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Alexandru Nicolae Ungureanu | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Frati, Riccardo | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Panichi, Matteo | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Grillo, Simone | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brustio, Paolo Riccardo | |
| 773 | 0 | |t International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance |g vol. 15, no. 4 (Apr 2020), p. 548 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Nursing & Allied Health Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2420186217/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |