Investigating the correlation of muscle function tests and sarcomere organization in C. elegans

I tiakina i:
Ngā taipitopito rārangi puna kōrero
I whakaputaina i:bioRxiv (Apr 14, 2021), p. n/a
Kaituhi matua: Lesanpezeshki, Leila
Ētahi atu kaituhi: Qadota, Hiroshi, Masoud Norouzi Darabad, Kashyap, Karishma, Lacerda, Carla Mr, Szewczyk, Nathaniel J, Benian, Guy, Vanapalli, Siva A
I whakaputaina:
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Ngā marau:
Urunga tuihono:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
Ngā Tūtohu: Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
Whakaahuatanga
Whakarāpopotonga:Background: Caenorhabditis elegans has been widely used as a model to study muscle structure and function due to many genes having human homologs. Its body wall muscle is functionally and structurally similar to vertebrate skeletal muscle with conserved molecular pathways contributing to sarcomere structure, and muscle function. However, a systematic investigation of the relationship between muscle force and sarcomere organization is lacking. Here, we investigate the contribution of various sarcomere proteins and membrane attachment components to muscle structure and function to introduce C. elegans as a model organism to study the genetic basis of muscle strength. Methods: We employ two recently developed assays that involve exertion of muscle forces to investigate the correlation of muscle function to sarcomere organization. We utilized a microfluidic pillar-based platform called NemaFlex that quantifies the maximum exertable force and a burrowing assay that challenges the animals to move in three dimensions under a chemical stimulus. We selected 20 mutants with known defects in various substructures of sarcomeres and compared the physiological function of muscle proteins required for force generation and transmission. We also characterized the degree of sarcomere disorganization using immunostaining approaches. Results: We find that mutants with genetic defects in thin filaments, thick filaments and M-lines were generally weaker. Some mutations did not influence muscle strength suggesting a degree of redundancy in muscle genes contributing to muscle function. We find that the NemaFlex and burrowing assays are functionally distinct informing on different aspects of muscle physiology enabling us to combine their readouts to develop an integrated muscle function score. This muscle function score was found to negatively correlate with the score for muscle structure disorganization. Conclusions: Our results highlight the suitability of NemaFlex and burrowing assays for evaluating muscle physiology of C. elegans. Using these approaches, we discuss the importance of the studied sarcomere proteins for muscle function and structure. The scoring methodology we have developed lays the foundation for investigating the contribution of conserved sarcomere proteins and membrane attachment components to human muscle function and strength. Competing Interest Statement S. A. V. is the co-founder of NemaLife Inc. that commercializes C. elegans assays. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.
ISSN:2692-8205
DOI:10.1101/2021.04.13.439723
Puna:Biological Science Database