An Empirical Study of Developers' Discussions about Security Challenges of Different Programming Languages
Na minha lista:
| Publicado no: | arXiv.org (Nov 26, 2021), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Outros Autores: | , , , |
| Publicado em: |
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Tags: |
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2556538782 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2331-8422 | ||
| 035 | |a 2556538782 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20211126 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Croft, Roland | |
| 245 | 1 | |a An Empirical Study of Developers' Discussions about Security Challenges of Different Programming Languages | |
| 260 | |b Cornell University Library, arXiv.org |c Nov 26, 2021 | ||
| 513 | |a Working Paper | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Given programming languages can provide different types and levels of security support, it is critically important to consider security aspects while selecting programming languages for developing software systems. Inadequate consideration of security in the choice of a programming language may lead to potential ramifications for secure development. Whilst theoretical analysis of the supposed security properties of different programming languages has been conducted, there has been relatively little effort to empirically explore the actual security challenges experienced by developers. We have performed a large-scale study of the security challenges of 15 programming languages by quantitatively and qualitatively analysing the developers' discussions from Stack Overflow and GitHub. By leveraging topic modelling, we have derived a taxonomy of 18 major security challenges for 6 topic categories. We have also conducted comparative analysis to understand how the identified challenges vary regarding the different programming languages and data sources. Our findings suggest that the challenges and their characteristics differ substantially for different programming languages and data sources, i.e., Stack Overflow and GitHub. The findings provide evidence-based insights and understanding of security challenges related to different programming languages to software professionals (i.e., practitioners or researchers). The reported taxonomy of security challenges can assist both practitioners and researchers in better understanding and traversing the secure development landscape. This study highlights the importance of the choice of technology, e.g., programming language, in secure software engineering. Hence, the findings are expected to motivate practitioners to consider the potential impact of the choice of programming languages on software security. | |
| 653 | |a Taxonomy | ||
| 653 | |a Software | ||
| 653 | |a Programming languages | ||
| 653 | |a Software engineering | ||
| 653 | |a Empirical analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Security management | ||
| 653 | |a Data sources | ||
| 653 | |a Security aspects | ||
| 653 | |a Software development | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Xie, Yongzheng | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zahedi, Mansooreh | |
| 700 | 1 | |a M Ali Babar | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Treude, Christoph | |
| 773 | 0 | |t arXiv.org |g (Nov 26, 2021), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Engineering Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2556538782/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13723 |