Comparison between Three Techniques for Determining Glomerular Filtration Rates: 99mTc-Diethylene Triamine Penta-Acetic Acid Renography, Double Plasma Sampling Method, and Single Plasma Sampling Method in Vietnamese Patients

Kaydedildi:
Detaylı Bibliyografya
Yayımlandı:Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine : IJNM vol. 36, no. 3 (Jul 2021), p. 300
Yazar: Thang Quoc
Diğer Yazarlar: Kim, Nguyen Thi, Dang, Tung, Xuan, Huy, Truong Tung
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi:
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd.
Konular:
Online Erişim:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
Etiketler: Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 2576808210
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0972-3919 
022 |a 0974-0244 
024 7 |a 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_240_20  |2 doi 
035 |a 2576808210 
045 2 |b d20210701  |b d20210731 
084 |a 129519  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Thang Quoc  |u Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Vinmec International Hospital, Hanoi 
245 1 |a Comparison between Three Techniques for Determining Glomerular Filtration Rates: <sup>99m</sup>Tc-Diethylene Triamine Penta-Acetic Acid Renography, Double Plasma Sampling Method, and Single Plasma Sampling Method in Vietnamese Patients 
260 |b Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd.  |c Jul 2021 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is an important indicator of renal function. Many methods have been developed to determine GFR in clinical examinations. This study aims to correlate between radionuclide plasma sampling methods (single and double blood samples, in vitro methods) and in vivo Gate's method using 99mTc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) renography. Materials and Methods: 43 patients underwent this study, including 31 renal donors (Group 1) and 12 patients with obstructive uropathy (Group 2). All patients were administered with a range of 5–7 mCi of 99mTc-DTPA. Then, renography performed simultaneously after injection and GFR calculation followed by Gate's method. Blood samples were collected at 60- and 120-min postinjection, samples were counted by a thyroid uptake system, and GFR was calculated using a single plasma sample method (SPSM) and a double plasma sample method (DPSM). Results: The mean GFRs calculated by Gate's method in Groups 1 and 2 were 85.8 ± 18.2 ml/min and 118.4 ± 13.9 ml/min, respectively. Meanwhile, using the in vitro blood sampling methods (DPSM and SPSM), the mean GFRs in Group 1 were 73.8 ± 15.4 ml/min and 56.4 ± 20.9 ml/min, respectively, and in Group 2 were 116.8 ± 12.9 ml/min and 106.3 ± 18.5 ml/min, respectively. There is a high correlation between Gate's method and DPSM in two groups (r = 0.86 and 0.72, respectively), and a moderate correlation was found between Gate's method and SPSM in both groups (r = 0.49 and r = 0.37, respectively). The two in vitro methods (DPSM and SPSM) revealed that moderate correlation in both groups (r = 0.74 and r = 0.67, respectively) was observed. Conclusion: Renography is a simple method but considered inaccurate for GFR determination. However, in vitro plasma sampling is rarely used in Vietnam. In this study, Gate's method correlated well with DPSM and tended to overestimate GFR. Further, the in vitro methods can be applied to correct the in vivo method as a confirmatory test in some cases. 
653 |a Renal function 
653 |a In vitro methods and tests 
653 |a Plasma 
653 |a Methods 
653 |a Mathematical analysis 
653 |a Diethylene triamine 
653 |a In vivo methods and tests 
653 |a Blood 
653 |a Sampling methods 
653 |a Acetic acid 
653 |a Radioisotopes 
700 1 |a Kim, Nguyen Thi  |u Department of Nuclear Medicine, 108 Military Central Hospital, Hanoi 
700 1 |a Dang, Tung  |u Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Vinmec International Hospital, Hanoi 
700 1 |a Xuan, Huy  |u Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University; Drug Design and Pharmacology, PHENIKAA Institute for Advanced Study, PHENIKAA University, Hanoi 
700 1 |a Truong Tung  |u Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, PHENIKAA University; Drug Design and Pharmacology, PHENIKAA Institute for Advanced Study, PHENIKAA University, Hanoi 
773 0 |t Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine : IJNM  |g vol. 36, no. 3 (Jul 2021), p. 300 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2576808210/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u http://www.ijnm.in/article.asp?issn=0972-3919;year=2021;volume=36;issue=3;spage=300;epage=303;aulast=Quoc