Tailoring Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Targeted Class Manipulation Using DeepFool Algorithm
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | arXiv.org (Aug 30, 2024), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , , |
| Publicado: |
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2880592903 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2331-8422 | ||
| 035 | |a 2880592903 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20240830 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a S M Fazle Rabby Labib | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Tailoring Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Networks for Targeted Class Manipulation Using DeepFool Algorithm | |
| 260 | |b Cornell University Library, arXiv.org |c Aug 30, 2024 | ||
| 513 | |a Working Paper | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The susceptibility of deep neural networks (DNNs) to adversarial attacks undermines their reliability across numerous applications, underscoring the necessity for an in-depth exploration of these vulnerabilities and the formulation of robust defense strategies. The DeepFool algorithm by Moosavi-Dezfooli et al. (2016) represents a pivotal step in identifying minimal perturbations required to induce misclassification of input images. Nonetheless, its generic methodology falls short in scenarios necessitating targeted interventions. Additionally, previous research studies have predominantly concentrated on the success rate of attacks without adequately addressing the consequential distortion of images, the maintenance of image quality, or the confidence threshold required for misclassification. To bridge these gaps, we introduce the Enhanced Targeted DeepFool (ET DeepFool) algorithm, an evolution of DeepFool that not only facilitates the specification of desired misclassification targets but also incorporates a configurable minimum confidence score. Our empirical investigations demonstrate the superiority of this refined approach in maintaining the integrity of images and minimizing perturbations across a variety of DNN architectures. Unlike previous iterations, such as the Targeted DeepFool by Gajjar et al. (2022), our method grants unparalleled control over the perturbation process, enabling precise manipulation of model responses. Preliminary outcomes reveal that certain models, including AlexNet and the advanced Vision Transformer, display commendable robustness to such manipulations. This discovery of varying levels of model robustness, as unveiled through our confidence level adjustments, could have far-reaching implications for the field of image recognition. Our code will be made public upon acceptance of the paper. | |
| 653 | |a Algorithms | ||
| 653 | |a Image quality | ||
| 653 | |a Integrity | ||
| 653 | |a Confidence intervals | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial neural networks | ||
| 653 | |a Neural networks | ||
| 653 | |a Perturbation | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Mondal, Joyanta Jyoti | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meem Arafat Manab | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Newaz, Sarfaraz | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xiao, Xi | |
| 773 | 0 | |t arXiv.org |g (Aug 30, 2024), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Engineering Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2880592903/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13019 |