The implementation of peer assessment as a scaffold during computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning in secondary STEM education
Guardat en:
| Publicat a: | International Journal of STEM Education vol. 11, no. 1 (Dec 2024), p. 3 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Altres autors: | , , |
| Publicat: |
Springer Nature B.V.
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Citation/Abstract Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetes: |
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2918402910 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2196-7822 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s40594-024-00465-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 2918402910 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20241201 |b d20241231 | |
| 084 | |a 243237 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Van Hoe, Amber |u Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798) | |
| 245 | 1 | |a The implementation of peer assessment as a scaffold during computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning in secondary STEM education | |
| 260 | |b Springer Nature B.V. |c Dec 2024 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a BackgroundComputer-supported collaborative inquiry learning (CSCiL) has been proposed as a successful learning method to foster scientific literacy. This research aims to bridge the knowledge gap surrounding the role of peers as scaffolding sources in CSCiL environments. The primary objective is to explicitly implement peer assessment as a scaffolding tool to enhance students' inquiry output in terms of research question, data, and conclusion. Additionally, students’ perceptions of peer assessment within CSCiL are explored.ResultsThe study involved 9th and 10th-grade students from 12 schools (N = 382), exploring the effects of peer assessment with and without peer dialogue. The results highlight that while adjustments were more frequently made to the research question and data, adjustments to the conclusion showed significantly greater improvement. Furthermore, students’ perceptions of peer assessment during CSCiL were examined, revealing that students generally perceive peer assessment as fair and useful, and they accept it while being willing to make improvements based on the feedback. While students did not report experiencing negative feelings, they also did not report positive emotions from the process. Additionally, the study found that including a peer dialogue in the peer assessment process did not significantly impact the abovementioned findings.ConclusionsThis study enriches our understanding of peer assessment as a scaffolding tool in CSCiL, highlighting its potential to improve inquiry outputs and providing valuable insights for instructional design and implementation. | |
| 653 | |a Questions | ||
| 653 | |a Computer aided testing | ||
| 653 | |a Computer assisted instruction--CAI | ||
| 653 | |a Technical education | ||
| 653 | |a Inquiry method | ||
| 653 | |a Schools | ||
| 653 | |a Instructional design | ||
| 653 | |a Students | ||
| 653 | |a Scaffolding | ||
| 653 | |a STEM education | ||
| 653 | |a Peer relationships | ||
| 653 | |a Collaborative learning | ||
| 653 | |a Secondary school students | ||
| 653 | |a Grade 10 | ||
| 653 | |a Scientific Literacy | ||
| 653 | |a Computers | ||
| 653 | |a Social | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Wiebe, Joel |u University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rotsaert, Tijs |u Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schellens, Tammy |u Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (GRID:grid.5342.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2069 7798) | |
| 773 | 0 | |t International Journal of STEM Education |g vol. 11, no. 1 (Dec 2024), p. 3 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Agriculture Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2918402910/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/2918402910/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |