Scheduling Jobs with Work-Inefficient Parallel Solutions
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | arXiv.org (May 20, 2024), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Publicado: |
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3057537846 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2331-8422 | ||
| 035 | |a 3057537846 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20240520 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kuszmaul, William | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Scheduling Jobs with Work-Inefficient Parallel Solutions | |
| 260 | |b Cornell University Library, arXiv.org |c May 20, 2024 | ||
| 513 | |a Working Paper | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This paper introduces the \emph{serial-parallel decision problem}. Consider an online scheduler that receives a series of tasks, where each task has both a parallel and a serial implementation. The parallel implementation has the advantage that it can make progress concurrently on multiple processors, but the disadvantage that it is (potentially) work-inefficient. As tasks arrive, the scheduler must decide for each task which implementation to use. We begin by studying \emph{total awake time}. We give a simple \emph{decide-on-arrival} scheduler that achieves a competitive ratio of \(3\) for total awake time -- this scheduler makes serial/parallel decisions immediately when jobs arrive. Our second result is an \emph{parallel-work-oblivious} scheduler that achieves a competitive ratio of \(6\) for total awake time -- this scheduler makes all of its decisions based only on the size of each serial job and without needing to know anything about the parallel implementations. Finally, we prove a lower bound showing that, if a scheduler wishes to achieve a competitive ratio of \(O(1)\), it can have at most one of the two aforementioned properties (decide-on-arrival or parallel-work-oblivious). We also prove lower bounds of the form \(1 + \Omega(1)\) on the optimal competitive ratio for any scheduler. Next, we turn our attention to optimizing \emph{mean response time}. Here, we show that it is possible to achieve an \(O(1)\) competitive ratio with \(O(1)\) speed augmentation. This is the most technically involved of our results. We also prove that, in this setting, it is not possible for a parallel-work-oblivious scheduler to do well. In addition to these results, we present tight bounds on the optimal competitive ratio if we allow for arrival dependencies between tasks (e.g., tasks are components of a single parallel program), and we give an in-depth discussion of the remaining open questions. | |
| 653 | |a Lower bounds | ||
| 653 | |a Task scheduling | ||
| 653 | |a Parallel programming | ||
| 653 | |a Computer aided scheduling | ||
| 653 | |a Employment | ||
| 653 | |a Decisions | ||
| 653 | |a Optimization | ||
| 653 | |a Competition | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Westover, Alek | |
| 773 | 0 | |t arXiv.org |g (May 20, 2024), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Engineering Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3057537846/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11986 |