The Effect of Using WhatsApp Bot on English Vocabulary Learning
Збережено в:
| Опубліковано в:: | Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education vol. 25, no. 2 (2024), p. 208 |
|---|---|
| Автор: | |
| Інші автори: | , |
| Опубліковано: |
Anadolu University
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Теги: |
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3075709741 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 035 | |a 3075709741 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20240101 |b d20241231 | |
| 084 | |a EJ1422448 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ali Al Ghaithi | |
| 245 | 1 | |a The Effect of Using WhatsApp Bot on English Vocabulary Learning | |
| 260 | |b Anadolu University |c 2024 | ||
| 513 | |a Tests/Questionnaires Report Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This study tried to design a WhatsApp bot to be implemented in English language vocabulary learning context in Oman. 150 Omani English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students from three different proficiency levels were selected based on random sampling. To measure the effectiveness of the treatment, pretests, posttests, and delayed posttests were conducted, respectively. The TAM 2 extended questionnaire was also used to understand learners' perceptions regarding the use of the WhatsApp bot in the learning process. The results of the study revealed that the WhatsApp bot, on all three levels, works nicely and practically. Although experimental groups, who used WhatsApp bot, at elementary and intermediate levels showed significant differences from the traditional face-to-face classes, pre-intermediate students showed no significant difference between the two mentioned terms. It was also understood that chatbots could be the best supplementary materials assisting teaching in delivering materials. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Oman | |
| 653 | |a Computer Software | ||
| 653 | |a Teaching Methods | ||
| 653 | |a Computer Assisted Instruction | ||
| 653 | |a Student Attitudes | ||
| 653 | |a Instructional Materials | ||
| 653 | |a Second Language Instruction | ||
| 653 | |a Second Language Learning | ||
| 653 | |a Vocabulary Development | ||
| 653 | |a English (Second Language) | ||
| 653 | |a Language Proficiency | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial Intelligence | ||
| 653 | |a Foreign Countries | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Processes | ||
| 653 | |a Instructional Effectiveness | ||
| 653 | |a Comparative Analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Language Tests | ||
| 653 | |a Programming Languages | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Behforouz, Behnam | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Isyaku, Hassan | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education |g vol. 25, no. 2 (2024), p. 208 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ERIC | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3075709741/abstract/embedded/ZKJTFFSVAI7CB62C?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1422448 |