Seeing is Believing: Vision-driven Non-crash Functional Bug Detection for Mobile Apps
Đã lưu trong:
| Xuất bản năm: | arXiv.org (Dec 4, 2024), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Tác giả chính: | |
| Tác giả khác: | , , , , , , , |
| Được phát hành: |
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Các nhãn: |
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3075791285 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2331-8422 | ||
| 035 | |a 3075791285 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20241204 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Liu, Zhe | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Seeing is Believing: Vision-driven Non-crash Functional Bug Detection for Mobile Apps | |
| 260 | |b Cornell University Library, arXiv.org |c Dec 4, 2024 | ||
| 513 | |a Working Paper | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Mobile app GUI (Graphical User Interface) pages now contain rich visual information, with the visual semantics of each page helping users understand the application logic. However, these complex visual and functional logic present new challenges to software testing. Existing automated GUI testing methods, constrained by the lack of reliable testing oracles, are limited to detecting crash bugs with obvious abnormal signals. Consequently, many non-crash functional bugs, ranging from unexpected behaviors to logical errors, often evade detection by current techniques. While these non-crash functional bugs can exhibit visual cues that serve as potential testing oracles, they often entail a sequence of screenshots, and detecting them necessitates an understanding of the operational logic among GUI page transitions, which is challenging traditional techniques. Considering the remarkable performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLM) in visual and language understanding, this paper proposes Trident, a novel vision-driven, multi-agent collaborative automated GUI testing approach for detecting non-crash functional bugs. It comprises three agents: Explorer, Monitor, and Detector, to guide the exploration, oversee the testing progress, and spot issues. We also address several challenges, i.e., align visual and textual information for MLLM input, achieve functionality-oriented exploration, and infer test oracles for non-crash bugs, to enhance the performance of functionality bug detection. We evaluate Trident on 590 non-crash bugs and compare it with 12 baselines, it can achieve more than 14%-112% and 108%-147% boost in average recall and precision compared with the best baseline. The ablation study further proves the contribution of each module. Moreover, Trident identifies 43 new bugs on Google Play, of which 31 have been fixed. | |
| 653 | |a User interface | ||
| 653 | |a Semantics | ||
| 653 | |a Graphical user interface | ||
| 653 | |a Vision | ||
| 653 | |a Large language models | ||
| 653 | |a Automation | ||
| 653 | |a Applications programs | ||
| 653 | |a Logic | ||
| 653 | |a Ablation | ||
| 653 | |a Software testing | ||
| 653 | |a Mobile computing | ||
| 653 | |a Effectiveness | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Cheng, Li | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Chunyang | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Junjie | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Mengzhuo | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wu, Boyu | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Yawen | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hu, Jun | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Qing | |
| 773 | 0 | |t arXiv.org |g (Dec 4, 2024), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Engineering Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3075791285/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03037 |