On the Actuality of Integrative Intellect-Mystical Asceticism as Self-Realization in View of Nicolaus de Cusa, Ibn Sīnā, and Others

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Religions vol. 15, no. 7 (2024), p. 819
Autor principal: Bartosch, David
Publicado:
MDPI AG
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3084983776
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2077-1444 
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel15070819  |2 doi 
035 |a 3084983776 
045 2 |b d20240101  |b d20241231 
084 |a 231555  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Bartosch, David 
245 1 |a On the Actuality of Integrative Intellect-Mystical Asceticism as Self-Realization in View of Nicolaus de Cusa, Ibn Sīnā, and Others 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2024 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a I argue for a transformative revival or actualization of the very core of an integrative, methodologically secured form of intellect-mystical asceticism. This approach draws on traditional sources that are re-examined from a systematic—synthetic and transcultural—philosophical perspective and in light of the multi-civilizational global environment of the 21st century. The main traditional points of reference in this paper are provided by Nicolaus de Cusa and Ibn Sīnā, and I refer to a few others, such as Attar of Nishapur, in passing. I begin by developing a basic concept of intellect-mystical asceticism. It is distinguished from mystification, science, scientism, and modes of everyday communication and cognition. Then, I make the case for an updated, transcultural approach to intellect-mysticism that can foster the internal (social) and external (environmental) reintegration of the human noosphere and technosphere in future planetary development. In this context, a modern intellect-mystical philosophical notion of “knowing non-knowing” (wissendes Nichtwissen, docta ignorantia) is developed. It is inspired by Nicolaus de Cusa and contextualized from a systematic transcultural angle at the same time. Finally, I discuss the problem of the practical, or rather ascetic, realization of the related possibilities of intellect-mystical self-enfolding. Here, the preceding steps of the reflection are mapped onto an outline regarding distinct developmental stages of such a transformative intellect-mystical practice in Ibn Sīnā’s Remarks and Admonitions (al-Ishārāt wat-Tanbīhāt). 
653 |a Traditions 
653 |a Consciousness 
653 |a Cognition & reasoning 
653 |a Mysticism 
773 0 |t Religions  |g vol. 15, no. 7 (2024), p. 819 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Religion Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3084983776/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3084983776/fulltext/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3084983776/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch