Icing on the Cake: Automatic Code Summarization at Ericsson
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | arXiv.org (Aug 19, 2024), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , , |
| Publicado: |
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3094928986 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2331-8422 | ||
| 035 | |a 3094928986 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20240819 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Sridhara, Giriprasad | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Icing on the Cake: Automatic Code Summarization at Ericsson | |
| 260 | |b Cornell University Library, arXiv.org |c Aug 19, 2024 | ||
| 513 | |a Working Paper | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This paper presents our findings on the automatic summarization of Java methods within Ericsson, a global telecommunications company. We evaluate the performance of an approach called Automatic Semantic Augmentation of Prompts (ASAP), which uses a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate leading summary comments for Java methods. ASAP enhances the \(LLM's\) prompt context by integrating static program analysis and information retrieval techniques to identify similar exemplar methods along with their developer-written Javadocs, and serves as the baseline in our study. In contrast, we explore and compare the performance of four simpler approaches that do not require static program analysis, information retrieval, or the presence of exemplars as in the ASAP method. Our methods rely solely on the Java method body as input, making them lightweight and more suitable for rapid deployment in commercial software development environments. We conducted experiments on an Ericsson software project and replicated the study using two widely-used open-source Java projects, Guava and Elasticsearch, to ensure the reliability of our results. Performance was measured across eight metrics that capture various aspects of similarity. Notably, one of our simpler approaches performed as well as or better than the ASAP method on both the Ericsson project and the open-source projects. Additionally, we performed an ablation study to examine the impact of method names on Javadoc summary generation across our four proposed approaches and the ASAP method. By masking the method names and observing the generated summaries, we found that our approaches were statistically significantly less influenced by the absence of method names compared to the baseline. This suggests that our methods are more robust to variations in method names and may derive summaries more comprehensively from the method body than the ASAP approach. | |
| 653 | |a Performance evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Large language models | ||
| 653 | |a Summaries | ||
| 653 | |a Information retrieval | ||
| 653 | |a Ablation | ||
| 653 | |a Statistical methods | ||
| 653 | |a Program verification (computers) | ||
| 653 | |a Methods | ||
| 653 | |a Open source software | ||
| 653 | |a Software development | ||
| 653 | |a Software development tools | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Roychowdhury, Sujoy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Soman, Sumit | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ranjani, H G | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Britto, Ricardo | |
| 773 | 0 | |t arXiv.org |g (Aug 19, 2024), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Engineering Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3094928986/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09735 |