National agroforestry program in Mexico faces trade-offs between reducing poverty, protecting biodiversity and targeting forest loss

Sábháilte in:
Sonraí bibleagrafaíochta
Foilsithe in:Environmental Research Letters vol. 19, no. 10 (Oct 2024), p. 104002
Príomhchruthaitheoir: Gonzalez-Moctezuma, Pablo
Rannpháirtithe: Rhemtulla, Jeanine M
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe:
IOP Publishing
Ábhair:
Rochtain ar líne:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Clibeanna: Cuir clib leis
Níl clibeanna ann, Bí ar an gcéad duine le clib a chur leis an taifead seo!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3096558195
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1748-9326 
024 7 |a 10.1088/1748-9326/ad6a27  |2 doi 
035 |a 3096558195 
045 2 |b d20241001  |b d20241031 
100 1 |a Gonzalez-Moctezuma, Pablo  |u Department of Forest & Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC, Canada 
245 1 |a National agroforestry program in Mexico faces trade-offs between reducing poverty, protecting biodiversity and targeting forest loss 
260 |b IOP Publishing  |c Oct 2024 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a National reforestation initiatives with ambitious targets and multiple objectives are becoming the norm across the Global South. The extent to which these large-scale initiatives are actually achieving their multiple and potentially conflicting objectives, however, is largely unknown. Sembrando Vida, a national initiative in Mexico implemented in 2019, pays smallholder farmers to plant agroforests in order to reduce poverty and forest loss, and protect biodiversity. We assessed to what degree program recruitment met its stated objectives via its selection of participating municipalities and households. Because program data are not publicly available, we consolidated and harmonized >14 million policy payments (totaling ∼$4 billion USD) to smallholder farmers, thus creating the first spatiotemporal dataset of program outcomes. We found that ∼450k rural households in ∼1000 municipalities across the country participated in the program consistently from 2019 to 2022. The program was reasonably well targeted to achieve its poverty reduction objectives. Significantly more households (ANOVA, p < 0.001) were enrolled in high-poverty (10.4%) than low-poverty (4.9%) municipalities, despite more money being transferred in absolute terms to low-poverty municipalities. The program did not reach some regions that best fit its three goals. Using a zero-inflated negative binomial model, we showed that the distribution of participating households was more likely to address poverty (coefficient = 0.51, p < 0.001 at household level) and forest cover loss (0.1, p = 0.01) than to restore areas important for biodiversity (−0.08, p = 0.02). Finally, we conducted a spatial analysis showing that there is technically sufficient rural land (4.29 Mha) and households (491k) to maximize the potential of all policy objectives simultaneously, but this would require that the program operate in only 83 municipalities across 10 states. Our results highlight the challenges in reaching high poverty regions while meeting multiple other objectives when scaling up forest landscape restoration. 
651 4 |a Mexico 
653 |a Reforestation 
653 |a Spatial analysis 
653 |a Variance analysis 
653 |a Agroforestry 
653 |a Forests 
653 |a Poverty 
653 |a Households 
653 |a Biodiversity 
653 |a Small farms 
653 |a Municipalities 
653 |a Objectives 
653 |a Farmers 
653 |a Social 
700 1 |a Rhemtulla, Jeanine M 
773 0 |t Environmental Research Letters  |g vol. 19, no. 10 (Oct 2024), p. 104002 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Engineering Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3096558195/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3096558195/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch