MORALIZAM I METAMORALIZAM

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Sociologija vol. 66, no. 2 (2024), p. 209
Autor principal: Kuljić, Todor
Publicado:
Sociolosko Udruzenje Srbije i Crne Gore (Sociological Association of Serbia and Montenegro)
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3098308682
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0038-0318 
022 |a 2406-0712 
024 7 |a 10.2298/SOC2402209K  |2 doi 
035 |a 3098308682 
045 2 |b d20240401  |b d20240630 
084 |a 160328  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Kuljić, Todor  |u Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet 
245 1 |a MORALIZAM I METAMORALIZAM 
260 |b Sociolosko Udruzenje Srbije i Crne Gore (Sociological Association of Serbia and Montenegro)  |c 2024 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Dva su cilja ovog priloga: (1) epistemološki, da pokaže razliku izmeðu saznajnih kapaciteta pojmova u naslovu i (2) ideološkokritički, da prepozna grupne interese iza hegemonih moralizama. Moralizacija propisuje dobro, emocionalizuje, homogenizuje, manipuliše moralnim uputstvima i zabranama i smanjuje autonomno rasuðivanje pojedinaca. Metamoralizam razdvaja procene stanja i ponašanja od moralnih sudova. Politički moralizam je deo ideološke svesti i oblik sužene saznajne perspektive. Prikazani su razni oblici istorijskih i savremenih političkih moralizama, njihov delatni emotivni potencijal, struktura i retorika neoliberalnog moralizma i samorefleksivni metamoralizam levice. Istaknuta je saznajna nadmoć metamoralizma koji nije procena nepravde sa stanovišta ličnog morala nego legitimnosti moći na koju se nepravda oslanja. There are two goals of this paper: (1) epistemologically, to show the difference between the cognitive capacities of the concepts in the title, and (2) ideologically-critical, to recognize the group interests behind hegemonic moralisms. The moralization prescribes the good, emotionalizes, homogenizes, manipulates moral instructions or prohibitions, and reduces the autonomous judgment of individuals. The metamoralism distinguishes evaluations of states and behavior from moral judgments. The political moralism is a part of ideological consciousness and a form of a narrow cognitive perspective.The various forms of historical and contemporary political moralisms, their active emotional potential, the structure and rhetoric of neoliberal moralism and the self-reflexive metamoralism of the left are presented. The cognitive supremacy of metamoralism is highlighted, which is not an assessment of injustice from the point of view of personal morality, but a superior assessment of the legitimacy of the power on which the injustice relies. 
610 4 |a North Atlantic Treaty Organization--NATO 
653 |a Morality 
653 |a Justice 
653 |a Cognition 
653 |a Rhetoric 
653 |a Neoliberalism 
653 |a Moral judgment 
653 |a Hegemony 
653 |a Legitimacy 
653 |a Ideology 
773 0 |t Sociologija  |g vol. 66, no. 2 (2024), p. 209 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Sociology Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3098308682/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3098308682/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3098308682/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch