Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation on the Left Posterior Inferior Frontal Gyrus Perturbs Complex Syntactic Processing Stability in Mandarin Chinese

-д хадгалсан:
Номзүйн дэлгэрэнгүй
-д хэвлэсэн:Neurobiology of Language vol. 5, no. 2 (2024), p. 608
Үндсэн зохиолч: Wu, Junjie
Бусад зохиолчид: Cheng, Yao, Qu, Xingfang, Kang, Tianmin, Cai, Yimin, Wang, Peng, Zaccarella, Emiliano, Friederici, Angela D, Hartwigsen, Gesa, Chen, Luyao
Хэвлэсэн:
MIT Press Journals, The
Нөхцлүүд:
Онлайн хандалт:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Шошгууд: Шошго нэмэх
Шошго байхгүй, Энэхүү баримтыг шошголох эхний хүн болох!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3100575923
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2641-4368 
024 7 |a 10.1162/nol_a_00140  |2 doi 
035 |a 3100575923 
045 2 |b d20240101  |b d20241231 
100 1 |a Wu, Junjie 
245 1 |a Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation on the Left Posterior Inferior Frontal Gyrus Perturbs Complex Syntactic Processing Stability in Mandarin Chinese 
260 |b MIT Press Journals, The  |c 2024 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a The structure of human language is inherently hierarchical. The left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (LpIFG) is proposed to be a core region for constructing syntactic hierarchies. However, it remains unclear whether LpIFG plays a causal role in syntactic processing in Mandarin Chinese and whether its contribution depends on syntactic complexity, working memory, or both. We addressed these questions by applying inhibitory continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) over LpIFG. Thirty-two participants processed sentences containing embedded relative clauses (i.e., complex syntactic processing), syntactically simpler coordinated sentences (i.e., simple syntactic processing), and non-hierarchical word lists (i.e., word list processing) after receiving real or sham cTBS. We found that cTBS significantly increased the coefficient of variation, a representative index of processing stability, in complex syntactic processing (esp., when subject relative clause was embedded) but not in the other two conditions. No significant changes in d′ and reaction time were detected in these conditions. The findings suggest that (a) inhibitory effect of cTBS on the LpIFG might be prominent in perturbing the complex syntactic processing stability but subtle in altering the processing quality; and (b) the causal role of the LpIFG seems to be specific for syntactic processing rather than working memory capacity, further evidencing their separability in LpIFG. Collectively, these results support the notion of the LpIFG as a core region for complex syntactic processing across languages. 
653 |a Reaction time 
653 |a Frontal gyrus 
653 |a Stimulation 
653 |a Achievement tests 
653 |a Information processing 
653 |a Syntactic complexity 
653 |a Syntactic processing 
653 |a Relative clauses 
653 |a Short term memory 
653 |a Chinese languages 
653 |a Mandarin 
653 |a Neurolinguistics 
653 |a Stimuli 
653 |a Regions 
653 |a Stability 
653 |a Inhibition 
653 |a Causality 
653 |a Hierarchies 
653 |a Languages 
653 |a Complex 
700 1 |a Cheng, Yao 
700 1 |a Qu, Xingfang 
700 1 |a Kang, Tianmin 
700 1 |a Cai, Yimin 
700 1 |a Wang, Peng 
700 1 |a Zaccarella, Emiliano 
700 1 |a Friederici, Angela D 
700 1 |a Hartwigsen, Gesa 
700 1 |a Chen, Luyao 
773 0 |t Neurobiology of Language  |g vol. 5, no. 2 (2024), p. 608 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Biological Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3100575923/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3100575923/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch