Interactive proofs for verifying (quantum) learning and testing
Guardat en:
| Publicat a: | arXiv.org (Oct 31, 2024), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Altres autors: | , , , , |
| Publicat: |
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Etiquetes: |
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3123152664 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2331-8422 | ||
| 035 | |a 3123152664 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20241031 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Caro, Matthias C | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Interactive proofs for verifying (quantum) learning and testing | |
| 260 | |b Cornell University Library, arXiv.org |c Oct 31, 2024 | ||
| 513 | |a Working Paper | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a We consider the problem of testing and learning from data in the presence of resource constraints, such as limited memory or weak data access, which place limitations on the efficiency and feasibility of testing or learning. In particular, we ask the following question: Could a resource-constrained learner/tester use interaction with a resource-unconstrained but untrusted party to solve a learning or testing problem more efficiently than they could without such an interaction? In this work, we answer this question both abstractly and for concrete problems, in two complementary ways: For a wide variety of scenarios, we prove that a resource-constrained learner cannot gain any advantage through classical interaction with an untrusted prover. As a special case, we show that for the vast majority of testing and learning problems in which quantum memory is a meaningful resource, a memory-constrained quantum algorithm cannot overcome its limitations via classical communication with a memory-unconstrained quantum prover. In contrast, when quantum communication is allowed, we construct a variety of interactive proof protocols, for specific learning and testing problems, which allow memory-constrained quantum verifiers to gain significant advantages through delegation to untrusted provers. These results highlight both the limitations and potential of delegating learning and testing problems to resource-rich but untrusted third parties. | |
| 653 | |a Questions | ||
| 653 | |a Algorithms | ||
| 653 | |a Quantum phenomena | ||
| 653 | |a Machine learning | ||
| 653 | |a Constraints | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Eisert, Jens | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hinsche, Marcel | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ioannou, Marios | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nietner, Alexander | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ryan Sweke | |
| 773 | 0 | |t arXiv.org |g (Oct 31, 2024), p. n/a | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Engineering Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3123152664/abstract/embedded/IZYTEZ3DIR4FRXA2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23969 |