Wildfire Risk Metric Impact on Public Safety Power Shut-off Cost Savings

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:arXiv.org (Nov 17, 2024), p. n/a
Autor principal: Greenough, Ryan
Otros Autores: Murakami, Kohei, Kleissl, Jan, Adil Khurram
Publicado:
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3130503869
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2331-8422 
035 |a 3130503869 
045 0 |b d20241117 
100 1 |a Greenough, Ryan 
245 1 |a Wildfire Risk Metric Impact on Public Safety Power Shut-off Cost Savings 
260 |b Cornell University Library, arXiv.org  |c Nov 17, 2024 
513 |a Working Paper 
520 3 |a Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) are a proactive strategy to mitigate fire hazards from power system infrastructure failures. System operators employ PSPS to deactivate portions of the electric grid with heightened wildfire risks to prevent wildfire ignition and redispatch generators to minimize load shedding. A measure of vegetation flammability, called the Wildland Fire Potential Index (WFPI), has been widely used to evaluate the risk of nearby wildfires to power system operation. However, the WFPI does not correlate as strongly to historically observed wildfire ignition probabilities (OWIP) as WFPI-based the Large Fire Probability (WLFP).Prior work chose not to incorporate wildfire-driven failure probabilities, such as the WLFP, because constraints with Bernoulli random variables to represent wildfire ignitions could require non-linear or non-convex constraints. This paper uses a deterministic equivalent of an otherwise complicating line de-energization constraint by quantifying the wildfire risk of operating transmission line as a sum of each energized line's wildfire ignition log probability (log(WIP)) rather than as a sum of each energized line's WFPI. A day-ahead unit commitment and line de-energization PSPS framework is used to assess the cost differences driven by the choice between the WFPI and WLFP risk metrics. Training the optimization on scenarios developed by mapping WLFP to log(WIP) rather than mapping the WFPI to log(WIP) leads to reductions in the total real-time costs. For the IEEE RTS 24-bus test system, mapping transmission line WLFP values to log(WIP) resulted in a 14.8 % (on average) decrease in expected real-time costs. 
653 |a Load shedding 
653 |a Hazard mitigation 
653 |a Sums 
653 |a Random variables 
653 |a Public safety 
653 |a Ignition 
653 |a Transmission lines 
653 |a Mapping 
653 |a Wildfires 
653 |a Electric power grids 
653 |a Unit commitment 
653 |a Real time 
653 |a Flammability 
653 |a Cost control 
653 |a Constraints 
653 |a Fire hazards 
653 |a Power dispatch 
653 |a Electric power systems 
700 1 |a Murakami, Kohei 
700 1 |a Kleissl, Jan 
700 1 |a Adil Khurram 
773 0 |t arXiv.org  |g (Nov 17, 2024), p. n/a 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Engineering Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3130503869/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10929