AI Benchmarks and Datasets for LLM Evaluation
Na minha lista:
| Publicado no: | arXiv.org (Dec 2, 2024), p. n/a |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Outros Autores: | |
| Publicado em: |
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Tags: |
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | LLMs demand significant computational resources for both pre-training and fine-tuning, requiring distributed computing capabilities due to their large model sizes \cite{sastry2024computing}. Their complex architecture poses challenges throughout the entire AI lifecycle, from data collection to deployment and monitoring \cite{OECD_AIlifecycle}. Addressing critical AI system challenges, such as explainability, corrigibility, interpretability, and hallucination, necessitates a systematic methodology and rigorous benchmarking \cite{guldimann2024complai}. To effectively improve AI systems, we must precisely identify systemic vulnerabilities through quantitative evaluation, bolstering system trustworthiness. The enactment of the EU AI Act \cite{EUAIAct} by the European Parliament on March 13, 2024, establishing the first comprehensive EU-wide requirements for the development, deployment, and use of AI systems, further underscores the importance of tools and methodologies such as Z-Inspection. It highlights the need to enrich this methodology with practical benchmarks to effectively address the technical challenges posed by AI systems. To this end, we have launched a project that is part of the AI Safety Bulgaria initiatives \cite{AI_Safety_Bulgaria}, aimed at collecting and categorizing AI benchmarks. This will enable practitioners to identify and utilize these benchmarks throughout the AI system lifecycle. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2331-8422 |
| Fonte: | Engineering Database |