Analyzing the Features, Usability, and Performance of Deploying a Containerized Mobile Web Application on Serverless Cloud Platforms
Na minha lista:
| Publicado no: | Future Internet vol. 16, no. 12 (2024), p. 475 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Outros Autores: | |
| Publicado em: |
MDPI AG
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| Tags: |
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3149619610 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1999-5903 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/fi16120475 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3149619610 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20240101 |b d20241231 | |
| 084 | |a 231464 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yang, Jeong | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Analyzing the Features, Usability, and Performance of Deploying a Containerized Mobile Web Application on Serverless Cloud Platforms | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2024 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Serverless computing services are offered by major cloud service providers such as Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and Microsoft Azure. The primary purpose of the services is to offer efficiency and scalability in modern software development and IT operations while reducing overall costs and operational complexity. However, prospective customers often question which serverless service will best meet their organizational and business needs. This study analyzed the features, usability, and performance of three serverless cloud computing platforms: Google Cloud’s Cloud Run, Amazon Web Service’s App Runner, and Microsoft Azure’s Container Apps. The analysis was conducted with a containerized mobile application designed to track real-time bus locations for San Antonio public buses on specific routes and provide estimated arrival times for selected bus stops. The study evaluated various system-related features, including service configuration, pricing, and memory and CPU capacity, along with performance metrics such as container latency, distance matrix API response time, and CPU utilization for each service. The results of the analysis revealed that Google’s Cloud Run demonstrated better performance and usability than AWS’s App Runner and Microsoft Azure’s Container Apps. Cloud Run exhibited lower latency and faster response time for distance matrix queries. These findings provide valuable insights for selecting an appropriate serverless cloud service for similar containerized web applications. | |
| 610 | 4 | |a National Institute of Standards & Technology | |
| 653 | |a Web services | ||
| 653 | |a Central processing units--CPUs | ||
| 653 | |a Containers | ||
| 653 | |a Usability | ||
| 653 | |a Performance measurement | ||
| 653 | |a Configuration management | ||
| 653 | |a Infrastructure | ||
| 653 | |a Security management | ||
| 653 | |a Applications programs | ||
| 653 | |a Cloud computing | ||
| 653 | |a Mobile computing | ||
| 653 | |a Real time | ||
| 653 | |a Internet service providers | ||
| 653 | |a Response time (computers) | ||
| 653 | |a Software development | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Abraham, Anoop | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Future Internet |g vol. 16, no. 12 (2024), p. 475 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ABI/INFORM Global | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3149619610/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3149619610/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3149619610/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |