Benchmarking the coding strategies of non-coding mutations on sequence-based downstream tasks with machine learning
Guardat en:
| Publicat a: | bioRxiv (Jan 2, 2025) |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Altres autors: | , , , |
| Publicat: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Etiquetes: |
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3150948807 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2692-8205 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1101/2025.01.01.631025 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3150948807 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20250102 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Liu, Zhe | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Benchmarking the coding strategies of non-coding mutations on sequence-based downstream tasks with machine learning | |
| 260 | |b Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |c Jan 2, 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Working Paper | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Non-coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are critical drivers of gene regulation and disease susceptibility, yet predicting their functional impact remains a challenging task. A variety of methods exist for encoding non-coding SNPs, such as direct base encoding or using pre-trained models to obtain embeddings. However, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation and guidance on the choice of encoding strategies for downstream prediction tasks involving non-coding SNPs. To address this gap, we present a benchmark study that compares six distinct encoding strategies for non-coding SNPs, assessing them across six dimensions, including interpretability, encoding abundance, and computational efficiency. Using three Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL)-related downstream tasks involving non-coding SNPs, we test these encoding strategies in combination with nine machine learning and deep learning models. Our findings demonstrate that semantic embeddings show strong robustness, while the choice of coding strategy and the model used for downstream prediction are all key variables influencing task performance. This benchmark provides actionable insights into the interplay between encoding strategies, models, and data properties, offering a framework for optimizing QTL prediction tasks and advancing the analysis of non-coding SNPs in genomic regulation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. | |
| 653 | |a Machine learning | ||
| 653 | |a Genomic analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Single-nucleotide polymorphism | ||
| 653 | |a Quantitative trait loci | ||
| 653 | |a Models | ||
| 653 | |a Predictions | ||
| 653 | |a Gene regulation | ||
| 653 | |a Deep learning | ||
| 653 | |a Choice learning | ||
| 653 | |a Learning algorithms | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Bao, Yihang | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Wenhao | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Weihao | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Guan Nin Lin | |
| 773 | 0 | |t bioRxiv |g (Jan 2, 2025) | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Biological Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3150948807/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.01.631025v1 |