An unexpected mode of whole-body regeneration from reaggregated cell suspension in Hydractinia (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa)

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:bioRxiv (Jan 6, 2025)
Autor principal: Curantz, Camille
Altres autors: Krasovec, Gabriel, Horkan, Helen Ruth, Ryan, Laura Marie, Varley, Aine, Frank, Uri
Publicat:
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Full text outside of ProQuest
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3151972827
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2692-8205 
024 7 |a 10.1101/2025.01.06.631080  |2 doi 
035 |a 3151972827 
045 0 |b d20250106 
100 1 |a Curantz, Camille 
245 1 |a An unexpected mode of whole-body regeneration from reaggregated cell suspension in Hydractinia (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) 
260 |b Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press  |c Jan 6, 2025 
513 |a Working Paper 
520 3 |a Hydrozoan cnidarians are among the few animals that can regenerate whole bodies from reaggregated cell dissociations but the cellular and molecular mechanisms that control this ability and how it is related to embryonic development are not well understood. Furthermore, the evolution of this type of regeneration is enigmatic since it does not occur naturally. Here, we show that aggregate regeneration in Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus proceeds through several, consistent stages that include the formation of an epidermal layer, followed by migration, proliferation, and differentiation of adult pluripotent stem cells, known as i-cells. Migration of i-cells is controlled by sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling. Single-cell transcriptomics revealed, surprisingly, that the newly regenerated individual derives nearly exclusively from i-cell progeny rather than from recycled somatic cells, as seen in other hydrozoans. Given the similarity of this phenomenon to embryogenesis, we propose that the ability of Hydractinia cell aggregates to regenerate is a side effect of the animal's i-cell-mediated development.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. 
653 |a Sphingosine 1-phosphate 
653 |a Molecular modelling 
653 |a Cell migration 
653 |a Cell differentiation 
653 |a Transcriptomics 
653 |a Pluripotency 
653 |a Embryogenesis 
653 |a Developmental stages 
653 |a Cell proliferation 
653 |a Somatic cells 
653 |a Hydrozoa 
653 |a Hydractinia 
700 1 |a Krasovec, Gabriel 
700 1 |a Horkan, Helen Ruth 
700 1 |a Ryan, Laura Marie 
700 1 |a Varley, Aine 
700 1 |a Frank, Uri 
773 0 |t bioRxiv  |g (Jan 6, 2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Biological Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3151972827/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3151972827/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.06.631080v1