Risk-taking propensity and its influence on lexical decision performance: a comparative study of high- and low-risk groups

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language and Cognition vol. 17 (Jan 2025)
1. Verfasser: Kim, Sangyub
Weitere Verfasser: Kim, Joonwoo, Lee, Solbin, Nam, Kichun
Veröffentlicht:
Cambridge University Press
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie das erste Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3153410895
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1866-9808 
022 |a 1866-9859 
024 7 |a 10.1017/langcog.2024.42  |2 doi 
035 |a 3153410895 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20250131 
084 |a 212133  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Kim, Sangyub  |u Department of Psychology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea 
245 1 |a Risk-taking propensity and its influence on lexical decision performance: a comparative study of high- and low-risk groups 
260 |b Cambridge University Press  |c Jan 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a We examined the impact of risk-taking propensity on lexical decision performance in neurologically intact participants. Following the classification of participants into high- and low-risk-taking propensity groups using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, we assessed lexical decision-making with behavioral responses (RTs, ACC), signal detection measures (hit, false alarm, miss, correct rejection) and qualitative processing using lexical variable effects (number of syllables, first syllable frequency, stem frequency, word frequency) between the groups. As a result, high-risk-taking individuals showed slower and less accurate word recognition, characterized by biased responses toward nonwords and words. However, both groups displayed similar patterns of lexical variable effects in word recognition, suggesting risk-taking propensity does not contribute to qualitative disparities in visual word recognition. These findings highlight the influential role of risk-taking propensity in shaping behavioral performance during lexical decision, emphasizing the need for further exploration of the intricate interplay between risk-taking behavior and lexical decision-making processes. 
653 |a Signal detection 
653 |a Comorbidity 
653 |a Syllables 
653 |a Nonwords 
653 |a Behavior 
653 |a False alarms 
653 |a Lexical processing 
653 |a Word frequency 
653 |a Comparative linguistics 
653 |a Word recognition 
653 |a Teenagers 
653 |a Decision making 
653 |a Risk 
653 |a Comparative studies 
653 |a Risk behavior 
653 |a Groups 
653 |a Classification 
653 |a Risk taking 
653 |a Risk assessment 
653 |a Comparative analysis 
653 |a Acknowledgment 
653 |a Behavioral responses 
653 |a High risk 
653 |a Propensity 
700 1 |a Kim, Joonwoo  |u Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea 
700 1 |a Lee, Solbin  |u Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea 
700 1 |a Nam, Kichun  |u School of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea 
773 0 |t Language and Cognition  |g vol. 17 (Jan 2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Research Library 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153410895/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153410895/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153410895/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch