Respiration facilitates behaviour during multisensory integration
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | bioRxiv (Jan 11, 2025) |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , , , |
| Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3154281131 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2692-8205 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1101/2025.01.10.632352 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3154281131 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20250111 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Saltafossi, Martina | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Respiration facilitates behaviour during multisensory integration | |
| 260 | |b Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |c Jan 11, 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Working Paper | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The brain processes information from the external environment alongside signals generated by the body. Among bodily rhythms, respiration emerges as a key modulator of sensory processing. Multisensory integration, the non-linear combination of information from multiple senses to reduce environmental uncertainty, may be influenced by respiratory dynamics. This study investigated how respiration modulates reaction times and multisensory integration in a simple detection task. Forty healthy participants were presented with unimodal (Auditory, Visual, Tactile) and bimodal (Audio-Tactile, Audio-Visual, Visuo-Tactile) stimuli while their respiratory activity was recorded. Results revealed that reaction times systematically varied with respiration, with faster responses during peak inspiration and early expiration but slower responses during the expiration-to-inspiration transition. Applying the race model inequality approach to quantify multisensory integration, we found that Audio-Tactile and Audio-Visual stimuli exhibited the highest integration during the expiration-to-inspiration phase. These findings conceivably reflect respiration phase-locked changes in cortical excitability which in turn, orchestrates multisensory integration. Interestingly, participants also tended to adapt their respiratory cycles, aligning response onsets preferentially with early expiration. This suggests that, rather than a mere bottom-up mechanism, respiration is actively adjusted to maximise the signal-to-noise balance between interoceptive and exteroceptive signals.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. | |
| 653 | |a Signal processing | ||
| 653 | |a Excitability | ||
| 653 | |a Respiration | ||
| 653 | |a Information processing | ||
| 653 | |a Visual stimuli | ||
| 653 | |a Sensory integration | ||
| 653 | |a Tactile stimuli | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Zaccaro, Andrea | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kluger, Daniel S | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mauro Gianni Perrucci | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ferri, Francesca | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Costantini, Marcello | |
| 773 | 0 | |t bioRxiv |g (Jan 11, 2025) | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Biological Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3154281131/abstract/embedded/J7RWLIQ9I3C9JK51?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.10.632352v1 |