Quantifying Feral Pig Interactions to Inform Disease Transmission Networks

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:bioRxiv (Jan 12, 2025)
Autor principal: Proboste, Tatiana
Altres autors: Turnlund, Abigail, Bengsen, Andrew, Gentle, Matthew, Wilson, Cameron, Harriott, Lana, Fuller, Richard, Marshall, Darren, Soares-Magalhaes, Ricardo
Publicat:
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Full text outside of ProQuest
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3154515447
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2692-8205 
024 7 |a 10.1101/2024.08.31.610621  |2 doi 
035 |a 3154515447 
045 0 |b d20250112 
100 1 |a Proboste, Tatiana 
245 1 |a Quantifying Feral Pig Interactions to Inform Disease Transmission Networks 
260 |b Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press  |c Jan 12, 2025 
513 |a Working Paper 
520 3 |a Feral pigs threaten biodiversity in 54 countries worldwide and cause an estimated $120 billion of damage annually in the United States of America (USA). Feral pigs imperil over 600 native species and have directly driven 14 species into extinction. Moreover, feral pig populations pose a significant zoonotic disease threat to humans such as Japanese encephalitis, and act as reservoir for endemic pathogens such as Brucella and leptospirosis. Efforts to understand and control disease spread by feral pigs rely on models of social dynamics, how the animals interact with one another. Yet social dynamics are known to vary enormously from place to place, so knowledge generated for example in USA and Europe might not easily transfer to locations such as Australia. Here, we fill a continental gap in our understanding of feral pig social dynamics by developing a proximity-based social network analysis approach to rapidly assess social interactions using animal tracking data. This method, applied to the continent of Australia, included 146 GPS-monitored feral pigs, and revealed distinct patterns influenced by sex and season, with females demonstrating higher group cohesion (female-female) and males acting as crucial connectors between independent groups. Contact rates are remarkably high within groups, indicating rapid intra-group disease spread that contrasts with much slower potential for inter-group disease spread. Seasonal variations further complicate this dynamic, with contact rates being much higher in summer. The results show that, in Australia, targeting adult males in feral pig control programs could enhance efforts to contain disease outbreaks. Concern over the economic and human health impacts of animal diseases is higher than ever before. We urge a rapid global effort to use models of feral pig social interactions to develop efficient control strategies tailored to local conditions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Footnotes* Figure labels were updated. We found that a General Linear Mixed Effect Model (Table 1) was not optimal for analysing the effect of sex on the network measures, and therefore this analysis has been done again using a non-parametric test (Wilcoxon rank-sum test) for direct and indirect networks based on a 5 metres threshold (Table 1).* https://github.com/Tatianaproboste/Feral-Pig-Interactions 
651 4 |a United States--US 
651 4 |a Australia 
653 |a Animal diseases 
653 |a Social organization 
653 |a Zoonoses 
653 |a Social interaction 
653 |a Disease transmission 
653 |a Endemic species 
653 |a Feral populations 
653 |a Disease 
653 |a Leptospirosis 
653 |a Indigenous species 
653 |a Encephalitis 
653 |a Hogs 
653 |a Species extinction 
653 |a Biodiversity 
653 |a Females 
653 |a Seasonal variations 
653 |a Disease spread 
653 |a Control programs 
653 |a Social interactions 
653 |a Animal models 
700 1 |a Turnlund, Abigail 
700 1 |a Bengsen, Andrew 
700 1 |a Gentle, Matthew 
700 1 |a Wilson, Cameron 
700 1 |a Harriott, Lana 
700 1 |a Fuller, Richard 
700 1 |a Marshall, Darren 
700 1 |a Soares-Magalhaes, Ricardo 
773 0 |t bioRxiv  |g (Jan 12, 2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Biological Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3154515447/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3154515447/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.31.610621v2