Knowledge is Power: An Explorative Study of Knowledge Work Among European Members of Parliament
Salvato in:
| Pubblicato in: | Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management vol. 23, no. 1 (2025), p. 34-47 |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Pubblicazione: |
Academic Conferences International Limited
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | Citation/Abstract Full Text - PDF |
| Tags: |
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3156970906 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1479-4411 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.34190/ejkm.23.1.3735 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3156970906 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 140192 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mittelstädt, René Marcel | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Knowledge is Power: An Explorative Study of Knowledge Work Among European Members of Parliament | |
| 260 | |b Academic Conferences International Limited |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The value of knowledge resources is widely recognized in both science and business, and knowledge management measures are increasingly being adopted in public authorities. However, parliaments, as core institutions of democratic systems, have thus far received scant attention in scientific studies. Furthermore, previous approaches fail to take into account the characteristics of the political system, such as elected offices, the relationship between government and opposition, or the lack of minimum qualifications for mandates. As a result, several studies consistently find that knowledge within parliament tends to be disorganized and lacking in transparency. This is unfortunate, as effective knowledge organization is crucial particularly for familiarizing oneself with unfamiliar topics without the necessary training. As part of an exploratory study, an international comparative study of knowledge management of all members of the 28 European national parliaments (including the EU Parliament) was initially carried out. Between May and June 2023, an online survey and several interviews were conducted as part of a mixed methods approach. Due to the very low response rate of only three percent, there is no claim to generalization and conclusions must be formulated with caution. Nevertheless, the results indicate that organizational and cultural barriers hinder effective knowledge work in parliament. The existing technical and human resources are insufficient to enable transparent and universal knowledge provision, while ideologies, career aspirations and electoral success further complicate the situation. A systematic approach to knowledge management has not yet been identified, leading to a shortage of resources and specialized knowledge to adequately process and utilize the vast amounts of information generated daily. Inexperienced MPs and opposition members, who are particularly dependent on reliable sources of information, are especially affected by these deficiencies. Without ignoring its limited power, this paper aims to make a modest contribution to the debate by presenting a first approach to a political knowledge management model. It highlights the need to raise awareness of knowledge management, develop a clear knowledge strategy and involve external expertise more. This research is of the opinion that a systematic approach to knowledge management can be established by integrating external expertise and IT-based solutions. Further research is needed, but knowledge management has the long-term potential to become a useful tool in parliamentary work by facilitating the necessary mentality change and thus contributing to a broader knowledge base. | |
| 653 | |a Comparative studies | ||
| 653 | |a Transparency | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge base | ||
| 653 | |a Experts | ||
| 653 | |a Members of Parliament | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge bases (artificial intelligence) | ||
| 653 | |a Human resources | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge | ||
| 653 | |a Aspiration | ||
| 653 | |a Political systems | ||
| 653 | |a Management | ||
| 653 | |a Management development programmes | ||
| 653 | |a Comparative analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge management | ||
| 653 | |a Legislatures | ||
| 653 | |a Parliaments | ||
| 653 | |a Occupational aspiration | ||
| 653 | |a Information sources | ||
| 653 | |a Power | ||
| 653 | |a Career aspirations | ||
| 653 | |a Qualifications | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management |g vol. 23, no. 1 (2025), p. 34-47 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Library Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3156970906/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3156970906/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |