How do vocational students evaluate vocational education internships – an evaluation scale development in China
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Education & Training vol. 67, no. 1 (2025), p. 90-106 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Publicado: |
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3159934217 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 0040-0912 | ||
| 022 | |a 1758-6127 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/ET-08-2023-0320 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3159934217 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20250209 | |
| 084 | |a 24104 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cailing Yan |u Institute of Vocational Education, Tongji University, Shanghai, China | |
| 245 | 1 | |a How do vocational students evaluate vocational education internships – an evaluation scale development in China | |
| 260 | |b Emerald Group Publishing Limited |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a PurposeThis research aims to construct an Evaluation Scale for Vocational Education Internships (ESVEI) tailored to assess the vocational educational internship experiences from the perspectives of vocational students. It also seeks to investigate the influence of certain factors – such as gender, family background, educational attainment, chosen major and the duration of the internship – on the assessment of these internships.Design/methodology/approachIn the development of ESVEI, a combination of methods was employed, including literature analysis, item refinement, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, multiple group analysis and reliability analysis. A total of 1,114 vocational students who had finished their internships completed questionnaires formulated based on ESVEI.FindingsA two-dimensional evaluation tool called the ESVEI, consisting of the “Internship Content Evaluation” (ICE) and “Internship Supervisor Evaluation” (ISE) with seven items, has been created. Based on this, the corresponding questionnaires’ results indicate that female respondents, those from urban areas and those in the medical and nursing fields generally rated their internships more favorably compared to their male, rural and engineering and manufacturing counterparts. Additionally, when the internships last less than six months, the longer the internship, the more favorable evaluations.Research limitations/implicationsBecause of the limited number of respondents, the research results may lack generalizability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed evaluation scale further.Practical implicationsThe scale developed in this study serves as a tangible instrument for assessing the vocational education internship experiences of vocational students. Furthermore, this analysis can provide valuable insights for identifying areas that require further growth and improvement based on the dimensions of internship content and the trainers involved.Originality/valueThis is one of the first studies to develop an evaluation scale for vocational education internships in China, which not only clarifies the evaluation dimensions of internships but also forms a tool for future research. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a China | |
| 653 | |a Reliability analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Internships | ||
| 653 | |a Education reform | ||
| 653 | |a Students | ||
| 653 | |a Collaboration | ||
| 653 | |a Careers | ||
| 653 | |a Educational evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Curricula | ||
| 653 | |a Two dimensional analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Questionnaires | ||
| 653 | |a Factor analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Feedback | ||
| 653 | |a Cooperation | ||
| 653 | |a Education | ||
| 653 | |a Vocational education | ||
| 653 | |a Evaluation Research | ||
| 653 | |a Literature Reviews | ||
| 653 | |a Competence | ||
| 653 | |a Stakeholders | ||
| 653 | |a Self Efficacy | ||
| 653 | |a Internship Programs | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Cooperation | ||
| 653 | |a Employment Potential | ||
| 653 | |a Vocational Evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Supervisors | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Change | ||
| 653 | |a Program Evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Labor Turnover | ||
| 653 | |a Student Evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Work Environment | ||
| 653 | |a School Policy | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Assessment | ||
| 653 | |a Formative Evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Institutional Cooperation | ||
| 653 | |a Summative Evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Career Planning | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Experience | ||
| 653 | |a Career Readiness | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Education & Training |g vol. 67, no. 1 (2025), p. 90-106 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ABI/INFORM Global | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3159934217/abstract/embedded/CH9WPLCLQHQD1J4S?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3159934217/fulltext/embedded/CH9WPLCLQHQD1J4S?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3159934217/fulltextPDF/embedded/CH9WPLCLQHQD1J4S?source=fedsrch |