Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector Processing

Guardado en:
Bibliografiske detaljer
Udgivet i:Engineering in Life Sciences vol. 25, no. 1 (Jan 1, 2025)
Hovedforfatter: Labisch, Jennifer J.
Andre forfattere: Evangelopoulou, Maria, Schleuß, Tobias, Pickl, Andreas
Udgivet:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fag:
Online adgang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3161305872
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1618-2863 
024 7 |a 10.1002/elsc.202400057  |2 doi 
035 |a 3161305872 
045 0 |b d20250101 
100 1 |a Labisch, Jennifer J.  |u Lab Essentials Applications Development, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany 
245 1 |a Investigating Ultrafiltration Membranes and Operation Modes for Improved Lentiviral Vector Processing 
260 |b John Wiley & Sons, Inc.  |c Jan 1, 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a ABSTRACT The demand for lentiviral vectors (LVs) as tools for ex vivo gene therapies is ever‐increasing. Despite their promising applications, challenges in LV production remain largely due to the fragile envelope, which challenges the maintenance of vector stability. Thus, downstream processing optimization to enhance efficiency, yield, and product quality is necessary. This study investigated the influence of membrane types and filtration devices during ultrafiltration (UF). Nine different membrane materials consisting of polyethersulfone (PES), regenerated cellulose, or Hydrosart, with distinct molecular weight cutoffs, were evaluated in stirred cells, centrifugal ultrafilters, and crossflow cassettes. The evaluation was based on the ability to retain infectious LV particles and remove impurities. The analysis revealed that a reinforced 100 kDa PES and a 300 kDa Hydrosart membrane had the best overall ability to concentrate infectious LVs and remove DNA, especially when operated in a stirred cell. Challenges were seen in the nonoptimized crossflow cassette process, where infectious LV recovery was generally lower compared to other devices. We demonstrated that membrane material and filtration device have a direct impact on the efficiency of LV UF. 
651 4 |a Germany 
653 |a Membranes 
653 |a Tensile strength 
653 |a Product quality 
653 |a Cross flow 
653 |a Cellulose 
653 |a Experiments 
653 |a Impurities 
653 |a Gene therapy 
653 |a Expression vectors 
653 |a Polyethersulfones 
653 |a Vector processing (computers) 
653 |a Molecular weight 
653 |a Chromatography 
653 |a Cassettes 
653 |a Manufacturing 
653 |a Ultrafiltration 
653 |a Vectors (Biology) 
653 |a Filtration 
653 |a Proteins 
700 1 |a Evangelopoulou, Maria  |u Lab Essentials Applications Development, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany 
700 1 |a Schleuß, Tobias  |u Ultrafiltration Membrane Technology, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany 
700 1 |a Pickl, Andreas  |u Lab Essentials Applications Development, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany 
773 0 |t Engineering in Life Sciences  |g vol. 25, no. 1 (Jan 1, 2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Engineering Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3161305872/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3161305872/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3161305872/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch