Development and maturity of co-word thematic clusters: the field of linked data
Guardado en:
| Udgivet i: | Library Hi Tech vol. 43, no. 1 (2025), p. 81-113 |
|---|---|
| Hovedforfatter: | |
| Andre forfattere: | , |
| Udgivet: |
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Tags: |
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3162627418 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 0737-8831 | ||
| 022 | |a 2054-166X | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1108/LHT-10-2022-0488 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3162627418 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20250228 | |
| 084 | |a 45886 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hosseini, Elaheh |u Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Development and maturity of co-word thematic clusters: the field of linked data | |
| 260 | |b Emerald Group Publishing Limited |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a PurposeThis research aimed to visualize and analyze the co-word network and thematic clusters of the intellectual structure in the field of linked data during 1900–2021.Design/methodology/approachThis applied research employed a descriptive and analytical method, scientometric indicators, co-word techniques, and social network analysis. VOSviewer, SPSS, Python programming, and UCINet software were used for data analysis and network structure visualization.FindingsThe top ranks of the Web of Science (WOS) subject categorization belonged to various fields of computer science. Besides, the USA was the most prolific country. The keyword ontology had the highest frequency of co-occurrence. Ontology and semantic were the most frequent co-word pairs. In terms of the network structure, nine major topic clusters were identified based on co-occurrence, and 29 thematic clusters were identified based on hierarchical clustering. Comparisons between the two clustering techniques indicated that three clusters, namely semantic bioinformatics, knowledge representation, and semantic tools were in common. The most mature and mainstream thematic clusters were natural language processing techniques to boost modeling and visualization, context-aware knowledge discovery, probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA), semantic tools, latent semantic indexing, web ontology language (OWL) syntax, and ontology-based deep learning.Originality/valueThis study adopted various techniques such as co-word analysis, social network analysis network structure visualization, and hierarchical clustering to represent a suitable, visual, methodical, and comprehensive perspective into linked data. | |
| 653 | |a Linked Data | ||
| 653 | |a Science | ||
| 653 | |a Social networks | ||
| 653 | |a Concept mapping | ||
| 653 | |a Ontology | ||
| 653 | |a Words (language) | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge discovery | ||
| 653 | |a Library and information science | ||
| 653 | |a Python | ||
| 653 | |a Semantic web | ||
| 653 | |a Clustering | ||
| 653 | |a Network analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Keywords | ||
| 653 | |a Tourism | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge representation | ||
| 653 | |a Bioinformatics | ||
| 653 | |a Data analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Big Data | ||
| 653 | |a Semantics | ||
| 653 | |a Cluster analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Publications | ||
| 653 | |a Programming languages | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge management | ||
| 653 | |a Web Ontology Language-OWL | ||
| 653 | |a Data collection | ||
| 653 | |a Indexing | ||
| 653 | |a Resource Description Framework-RDF | ||
| 653 | |a Libraries | ||
| 653 | |a Natural language processing | ||
| 653 | |a Software engineering | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge organization | ||
| 653 | |a Visualization | ||
| 653 | |a Information retrieval | ||
| 653 | |a Cultural heritage | ||
| 653 | |a Computer science | ||
| 653 | |a Analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Deep learning | ||
| 653 | |a Medical informatics | ||
| 653 | |a Semantic analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Social network analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Syntax | ||
| 653 | |a Hierarchies | ||
| 653 | |a Applied research | ||
| 653 | |a Research methodology | ||
| 653 | |a Language attitudes | ||
| 653 | |a Comorbidity | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Kimiya Taghizadeh Milani |u Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mohammad Shaker Sabetnasab |u Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, Boushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Library Hi Tech |g vol. 43, no. 1 (2025), p. 81-113 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ABI/INFORM Global | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3162627418/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3162627418/fulltext/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3162627418/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |