Surprise! Draw the scene: Visual recall reveals poor incidental working memory following visual search in natural scenes

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Memory & Cognition vol. 53, no. 1 (Jan 2025), p. 19
Autor principal: Cárdenas-Miller, Nicolás
Otros Autores: O'Donnell, Ryan E, Tam, Joyce, Wyble, Brad
Publicado:
Springer Nature B.V.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3165147143
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0090-502X 
022 |a 1532-5946 
024 7 |a 10.3758/s13421-023-01465-9  |2 doi 
035 |a 3165147143 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20250131 
084 |a 162334  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Cárdenas-Miller, Nicolás  |u Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA 
245 1 |a Surprise! Draw the scene: Visual recall reveals poor incidental working memory following visual search in natural scenes 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Jan 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Searching within natural scenes can induce incidental encoding of information about the scene and the target, particularly when the scene is complex or repeated. However, recent evidence from attribute amnesia (AA) suggests that in some situations, searchers can find a target without building a robust incidental memory of its task relevant features. Through drawingbased visual recall and an AA search task, we investigated whether search in natural scenes necessitates memory encoding. Participants repeatedly searched for and located an easily detected item in novel scenes for numerous trials before being unexpectedly prompted to draw either the entire scene (Experiment 1) or their search target (Experiment 2) directly after viewing the search image. Naïve raters assessed the similarity of the drawings to the original information. We found that surprise-trial drawings of the scene and search target were both poorly recognizable, but the same drawers produced highly recognizable drawings on the next trial when they had an expectation to draw the image. Experiment 3 further showed that the poor surprise trial memory could not merely be attributed to interference from the surprising event. Our findings suggest that even for searches done in natural scenes, it is possible to locate a target without creating a robust memory of either it or the scene it was in, even if attended to just a few seconds prior. This disconnection between attention and memory might reflect a fundamental property of cognitive computations designed to optimize task performance and minimize resource use. 
610 4 |a Pennsylvania State University 
651 4 |a Pennsylvania 
651 4 |a United States--US 
653 |a Mental task performance 
653 |a Attention task 
653 |a Memory 
653 |a Design 
653 |a Visual perception 
653 |a Experiments 
653 |a Amnesia 
653 |a Recall 
653 |a Encoding (Cognitive process) 
653 |a Task performance 
653 |a Art 
653 |a Disconnection 
653 |a Encoding 
653 |a Short term memory 
653 |a Drawings 
653 |a Memory disorders 
700 1 |a O'Donnell, Ryan E  |u Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA 
700 1 |a Tam, Joyce  |u Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA 
700 1 |a Wyble, Brad  |u Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA 
773 0 |t Memory & Cognition  |g vol. 53, no. 1 (Jan 2025), p. 19 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3165147143/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3165147143/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3165147143/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch