Brain regions supporting retrieval of words drawn at encoding: fMRI evidence for multimodal reactivation

Gardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Memory & Cognition vol. 53, no. 1 (Jan 2025), p. 282
Autor Principal: Roberts, Brady R T
Outros autores: Meade, Melissa E, Fernandes, Myra A
Publicado:
Springer Nature B.V.
Materias:
Acceso en liña:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3165147423
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0090-502X 
022 |a 1532-5946 
024 7 |a 10.3758/s13421-024-01591-y  |2 doi 
035 |a 3165147423 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20250131 
084 |a 162334  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Roberts, Brady R T  |u Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada 
245 1 |a Brain regions supporting retrieval of words drawn at encoding: fMRI evidence for multimodal reactivation 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Jan 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Memory for words that are drawn or sketched by the participant, rather than written, during encoding is typically superior. While this drawing benefit has been reliably demonstrated in recent years, there has yet to be an investigation of its neural basis. Here, we asked participants to either create drawings, repeatedly write, or list physical characteristics depicting each target word during encoding. Participants then completed a recognition memory test for target words while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Behavioural results showed memory was significantly higher for words drawn than written, replicating the typical drawing effect. Memory for words whose physical characteristics were listed at encoding was also higher than for those written repeatedly, but lower than for those drawn. Voxel-wise analyses of fMRI data revealed two distributed sets of brain regions more active for items drawn relative to written, the left angular gyrus (BA 39) and bilateral frontal (BA 10) regions, suggesting integration and self-referential processing during retrieval of drawn words. Brain-behaviour correlation analyses showed that the size of one's memory benefit for words drawn relative to written at encoding was positively correlated with activation in brain regions linked to visual representation and imagery (BA 17 and cuneus) and motor planning (premotor and supplementary motor areas; BA 6). This study suggests that drawing benefits memory by coactivating multiple sensory traces. Target words drawn during encoding are subsequently remembered by re-engaging visual, motoric, and semantic representations. 
653 |a Physical characteristics 
653 |a Memory 
653 |a Magnetic resonance imaging 
653 |a Functional magnetic resonance imaging 
653 |a Sensorimotor integration 
653 |a Visual system 
653 |a Dementia 
653 |a Brain mapping 
653 |a Brain 
653 |a Mental task performance 
653 |a Information processing 
653 |a Older people 
653 |a Sensory integration 
653 |a Neuroimaging 
653 |a Correlation analysis 
653 |a Semantics 
653 |a Imagery 
653 |a Encoding (Cognitive process) 
653 |a Regions 
653 |a Retrieval 
653 |a Recognition memory 
653 |a Encoding 
653 |a Lexical access 
653 |a Drawings 
653 |a Semantic processing 
653 |a Words 
653 |a Visual representation 
700 1 |a Meade, Melissa E  |u Department of Psychology, Huron College at Western University, London, Ontario, Canada 
700 1 |a Fernandes, Myra A  |u Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada 
773 0 |t Memory & Cognition  |g vol. 53, no. 1 (Jan 2025), p. 282 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3165147423/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3165147423/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3165147423/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch