MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3166221497
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0958-3440 
022 |a 1474-0109 
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0958344024000181  |2 doi 
035 |a 3166221497 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20250131 
084 |a 80033  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Amrate, Moustafa  |u University of Biskra, Algeria 
245 1 |a Computer-assisted pronunciation training: A systematic review 
260 |b Cambridge University Press  |c Jan 2025 
513 |a Journal Article Evidence Based Healthcare 
520 3 |a This systematic review maps the trends of computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) research based on the pedagogy of second language (L2) pronunciation instruction and assessment. The review was limited to empirical studies investigating the effects of CAPT on healthy L2 learners’ pronunciation. Thirty peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1999 and 2022 were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were collected about the studies’ contexts, participants, experimental designs, CAPT systems, pronunciation training scopes and approaches, pronunciation assessment practices, and learning measures. Using a pedagogically informed codebook, the pronunciation training and assessment practices were classified and evaluated based on established L2 pronunciation teaching guidelines. The findings indicated that most of the studies focused on the pronunciation training of adult English learners with an emphasis on the production of segmental features (i.e. vowels and consonants) rather than suprasegmental features (i.e. stress, intonation, and rhythm). Despite the innovation promised by CAPT technology, pronunciation practice in the studies reviewed was characterized by the predominant use of drilling through listen-and-repeat and read-aloud activities. As for assessment, most CAPT studies relied on human listeners to measure the accurate production of discrete pronunciation features (i.e. segmental and suprasegmental accuracy). Meanwhile, few studies employed global pronunciation learning measures such as intelligibility and comprehensibility. Recommendations for future research are provided based on the discussion of these results. 
653 |a Language 
653 |a Consonants (speech) 
653 |a Pedagogy 
653 |a Accuracy 
653 |a Comprehension 
653 |a Intelligibility 
653 |a English as a second language learning 
653 |a Feedback 
653 |a Journals 
653 |a Intonation 
653 |a Rhythm 
653 |a Oral reading 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Non-native accent 
653 |a Computer assisted language learning 
653 |a Suprasegmentals 
653 |a Phonetics 
653 |a Pronunciation instruction 
653 |a Speech 
653 |a Systematic review 
653 |a Adult education 
653 |a Listeners 
653 |a Production 
653 |a Consonants 
653 |a Vowels 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Innovations 
653 |a Evaluation 
653 |a Training 
653 |a Computer assisted research 
653 |a Pronunciation 
653 |a Suprasegmental features 
653 |a Phonemics 
653 |a Discrimination Learning 
653 |a Influence of Technology 
653 |a Conventional Instruction 
653 |a Acoustics 
653 |a Teaching Methods 
653 |a Direct Instruction 
653 |a Computers 
653 |a English (Second Language) 
653 |a Meta Analysis 
653 |a Second Language Learning 
653 |a Speech Evaluation 
653 |a Second Language Instruction 
700 1 |a Pi-hua Tsai  |u Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan 
773 0 |t ReCALL : the Journal of EUROCALL  |g vol. 37, no. 1 (Jan 2025), p. 22 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Psychology Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3166221497/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3166221497/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3166221497/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch