Exploring collaborative writing among large groups in online distance learning through a public forum and private chat tool
Guardado en:
| Udgivet i: | ReCALL : the Journal of EUROCALL vol. 37, no. 1 (Jan 2025), p. 43 |
|---|---|
| Hovedforfatter: | |
| Andre forfattere: | , , |
| Udgivet: |
Cambridge University Press
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Tags: |
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3166222540 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 0958-3440 | ||
| 022 | |a 1474-0109 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0958344024000211 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3166222540 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20250131 | |
| 084 | |a 80033 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fang Mei |u The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Exploring collaborative writing among large groups in online distance learning through a public forum and private chat tool | |
| 260 | |b Cambridge University Press |c Jan 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This study explored how collaborative writing, an often-used instructional strategy in second language (L2) learning, intersects with large-group dynamics, and investigated their potential impact on the quality of writing outcomes in an online distance learning course. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research scrutinized intra-group interaction processes in two large groups undertaking a computer-assisted language learning writing assignment and evaluated the impact of these interaction processes on their writing products. Data from discussions in both a public online forum and a private social communication platform (WeChat) were collected, systematically coded, and analysed quantitatively and qualitatively based on language functions. Data collection also included an assessment of the written products and follow-up group interviews. The findings indicate distinct interaction patterns between high-performing and low-performing groups, characterised by an expert/participant pattern and a dominant/passive pattern, respectively. Additionally, insights from the interviews shed light on these interaction patterns and the potential impact on student learning outcomes. The study suggests practical implications, highlighting the importance of task design in promoting high levels of collaborative knowledge construction to enhance students’ writing skills and L2 language learning in large-group settings. | |
| 653 | |a Interviews | ||
| 653 | |a Computer assisted instruction--CAI | ||
| 653 | |a Communication | ||
| 653 | |a Student participation | ||
| 653 | |a Equality | ||
| 653 | |a Distance learning | ||
| 653 | |a Teachers | ||
| 653 | |a Second language writing | ||
| 653 | |a Editing | ||
| 653 | |a Computer mediated communication | ||
| 653 | |a Computer assisted language learning | ||
| 653 | |a Decision making | ||
| 653 | |a Online instruction | ||
| 653 | |a Collaborative learning | ||
| 653 | |a Interpersonal communication | ||
| 653 | |a Education | ||
| 653 | |a Language | ||
| 653 | |a Group dynamics | ||
| 653 | |a Investigations | ||
| 653 | |a Writing | ||
| 653 | |a Leadership | ||
| 653 | |a Data collection | ||
| 653 | |a Second language learning | ||
| 653 | |a Educational objectives | ||
| 653 | |a Learning outcomes | ||
| 653 | |a Students | ||
| 653 | |a Cooperative learning | ||
| 653 | |a Collaboration | ||
| 653 | |a Language acquisition | ||
| 653 | |a Large groups | ||
| 653 | |a Internet | ||
| 653 | |a Literature Reviews | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Research | ||
| 653 | |a Communication (Thought Transfer) | ||
| 653 | |a Student Leadership | ||
| 653 | |a Collaborative Writing | ||
| 653 | |a Online Courses | ||
| 653 | |a Language Proficiency | ||
| 653 | |a Learner Engagement | ||
| 653 | |a Distance Education | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Processes | ||
| 653 | |a Computers | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Experience | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Technology | ||
| 653 | |a Class Size | ||
| 653 | |a Novices | ||
| 653 | |a Program Proposals | ||
| 653 | |a Electronic Learning | ||
| 653 | |a Proposal Writing | ||
| 653 | |a Leadership Styles | ||
| 653 | |a Outcomes of Education | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Ma, Qing |u The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tang, Jinlan |u Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zou, Bin |u Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China | |
| 773 | 0 | |t ReCALL : the Journal of EUROCALL |g vol. 37, no. 1 (Jan 2025), p. 43 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Psychology Collection | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3166222540/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3166222540/fulltext/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3166222540/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |