Biased Evaluative Descriptions
Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:
| Εκδόθηκε σε: | Journal of the American Philosophical Association vol. 10, no. 2 (Jun 2024), p. 295 |
|---|---|
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
| Έκδοση: |
Cambridge University Press
|
| Θέματα: | |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Ετικέτες: |
Δεν υπάρχουν, Καταχωρήστε ετικέτα πρώτοι!
|
| Περίληψη: | In this essay I identify a type of linguistic phenomenon new to feminist philosophy of language: biased evaluative descriptions. Biased evaluative descriptions are descriptions whose well-intended positive surface meanings are inflected with implicitly biased content. Biased evaluative descriptions are characterized by three main features: (1) they have roots in implicit bias or benevolent sexism, (2) their application is counterfactually unstable across dominant and subordinate social groups, and (3) they encode stereotypes. After giving several different kinds of examples of biased evaluative descriptions, I distinguish them from similar linguistic concepts, including backhanded compliments, slurs, insults, epithets, pejoratives, and dog whistles. I suggest that the traditional framework of Gricean implicature cannot account for biased evaluative descriptions. I discuss some challenges to the distinctiveness and evaluability of biased evaluative descriptions, including intersectional social identities. I conclude by discussing their social significance and moral status. Identifying biased evaluative descriptions is important for a variety of social contexts, from the very general and broad (political speeches) to the very particular and small (bias in academic hiring). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2053-4477 2053-4485 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/apa.2023.5 |
| Πηγή: | Arts & Humanities Database |